2008 United States presidential election: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards (revert. the content contradicted CZ policy) |
imported>Richard Jensen (update after May 6) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The [[United States]] will hold its 55th quadrennial presidential election on November 4, 2008. The rules are very complicated, and the race is long and expensive; the contenders by late March had already spent some $800 million seeking the party nomination, with Republican (GOP) contenders spending somewhat less than the Democrats. | The [[United States]] will hold its 55th quadrennial presidential election on November 4, 2008. The rules are very complicated, and the race is long and expensive; the contenders by late March had already spent some $800 million seeking the party nomination, with Republican (GOP) contenders spending somewhat less than the Democrats. | ||
The | The [[U.S. Democratic Party|Democpratic contenders]] are Senator [[Barack Obama]] of Illinois, who leads Senator [[Hillary Clinton]] of New York; all the other serious contenders have dropped out. After her victories in the Texas Ohio and Pennsylvania primaries, and Obama's troubles with his own minister, Obama's lead over Clinton among Democrats nationwide plunged from 10% to 0%, 45% to 45%, but Obama won big in the North Carolina primary on May 6 and held Clinton to a 1% win in Indiana. Obama has 155 more delegates (1848 versus 1693) to the national convention in Denver in late August, where a majority of 2024 will be neded to win the nomination.<ref> See the summary, updated daily, at [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/ Real Clear Politics]</ref> They faced off in the inconclusive "Tsunami Tuesday" [[primary election|primaries]] in 21 states on Feb. 5, and the popular vote was almost exactly 50%-50%. However Obama won the next eleven contests in a row and gained the "momentum" that impressed observers and worried the Clinton camp. Repeatedly the Clinton campaign was on the verge of collapse, but she came back with stunning wins in New Hampshire in January, California and Massachusetts in February, Texas and Ohio in March, and Pennsylvania in April. She was unable to keep up the pace in May, as she was heavily outspent and her treasury was empty; indeed Clinton has been loaning herself over $1 million a week, while Obama's fundraising had taken in unprecedented sums. On the other hand, of the six largest states, Obama carried his home state of Illinois, while Clinton carried the others five by sizeable margins. Clinton supporters argue Obama would be too weak in the critical large states in November, especially in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Although Obama will be close to a majority, there are only a few primaries left and neither candidate will be able to secure a majority of the elected delegates before the convention, so the decision will be made by the unelected "superdelegates" who comprise 18% of the convention delegates. They are 796 lawmakers, governors and state and local party officials who, since a rules change in 1982, automatically become delegates and can vote any way they wish. By May 7, Clinton had support from 271 superdelegates and Obama had 260, with the remaining 265 uncommitted but under heavy pressure from the candidates. The regular delegates favored Obama 1588 to 1422, primarily because of his overwhelming success in caucus states, where his well-educated base has proven highly effective.<ref>See http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html </ref> | ||
Serious confusion | Serious confusion surrounded the delegations from Michigan and Florida, which the National Committee refuses to seat. Neither candidate campaigned in either state, but primaries were held and Clinton won them and wants those delegates, or a new election. Democrats in Florida, especially, are embittered by being shut out of the convention, which may shift this closely contested state to McCain.<ref> Jay Cost, "What Will Happen with Florida?" [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2008/03/what_will_happen_with_florida_1.html ''RealCrearPolitics March 14, 2008] | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The [[U.S. Republican Party|Republicans]] gave victory to Arizona Senator [[John McCain]] in most of the primaries, and national leaders have rallied to his cause. He gained a majority of delegates on March 4, and his opponents have dropped out and endorsed him. The right wing of the party, led by radio talk show hosts, was angry with McCain, who has been a maverick and appeals especially to moderates and independents, and even to many Democrats as well, but seemed in April to be more accepting oh ist candidacy. On Tsunami Tuesday McCain polled 41% to 31% for [[Mitt Romney]] and 21% for [[Mike Huckabee]]. Romney sought the support of the most [[American conservatism|conservative Republicans]], but shared that base with Huckabee, who was strongest among evangelicals. Romney won 273 delegates but dropped out of the race on Feb. 7 and later endorsed McCain.<ref> See [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html Real Clear Politics] and the [http://election.msn.com/ MSNBC results, updated daily]</ref> | The [[U.S. Republican Party|Republicans]] gave victory to Arizona Senator [[John McCain]] in most of the primaries, and national leaders have rallied to his cause. He gained a majority of delegates on March 4, and his opponents have dropped out and endorsed him. The right wing of the party, led by radio talk show hosts, was angry with McCain, who has been a maverick and appeals especially to moderates and independents, and even to many Democrats as well, but seemed in April to be more accepting oh ist candidacy. On Tsunami Tuesday McCain polled 41% to 31% for [[Mitt Romney]] and 21% for [[Mike Huckabee]]. Romney sought the support of the most [[American conservatism|conservative Republicans]], but shared that base with Huckabee, who was strongest among evangelicals. Romney won 273 delegates but dropped out of the race on Feb. 7 and later endorsed McCain.<ref> See [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html Real Clear Politics] and the [http://election.msn.com/ MSNBC results, updated daily]</ref> | ||
Each party will officially name its ticket at its national convention in late August in Denver for the Democrats and early September in St. Paul, Minnesota, for the GOP. The GOP convention will be a nominal affair controlled by McCain, | Each party will officially name its ticket at its national convention in late August in Denver for the Democrats and early September in St. Paul, Minnesota, for the GOP. The GOP convention will be a nominal affair controlled by McCain, and observers expect Obama will have a majority by some time in June. | ||
New York City Mayor [[Michael Bloomberg]] had been making preparations for the possibility of becoming an independent candidate. As a multi-billionaire he has the capacity to finance his own campaign without outside contributions or federal matching funds. In March he announced he would not run. | New York City Mayor [[Michael Bloomberg]] had been making preparations for the possibility of becoming an independent candidate. As a multi-billionaire he has the capacity to finance his own campaign without outside contributions or federal matching funds. In March he announced he would not run. | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
After the virtual tie on Tsunami Tuesday, analysts warned that Clinton faces an uphill fight. Obama is much better funded, outpacing her 2-1 in January, when he brought in $32 million to her $17 million. Obama swept all 11 contests after Feb. 5, winning major states such as Virginia, Maryland and Wisconsin by increasing landslides, and cutting deeply into Clinton's coalition. Clinton's campaign leaders agree that Texas and Ohio are her last stand. Bill Clinton told audiences there, "If she wins Texas and Ohio I think she will be the nominee. If you don't deliver for her, I don't think she can be. It's all on you."<ref>Rick Klein and Sarah Amos, "Bill Clinton: Texas Could Be Hillary's Last Stand," [http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4318311&page=1 ABC News Feb 20, 2008] </ref> Clinton mobilized her coalition, winning Texas by 100,000 and carrying Ohio by a landslide. | After the virtual tie on Tsunami Tuesday, analysts warned that Clinton faces an uphill fight. Obama is much better funded, outpacing her 2-1 in January, when he brought in $32 million to her $17 million. Obama swept all 11 contests after Feb. 5, winning major states such as Virginia, Maryland and Wisconsin by increasing landslides, and cutting deeply into Clinton's coalition. Clinton's campaign leaders agree that Texas and Ohio are her last stand. Bill Clinton told audiences there, "If she wins Texas and Ohio I think she will be the nominee. If you don't deliver for her, I don't think she can be. It's all on you."<ref>Rick Klein and Sarah Amos, "Bill Clinton: Texas Could Be Hillary's Last Stand," [http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4318311&page=1 ABC News Feb 20, 2008] </ref> Clinton mobilized her coalition, winning Texas by 100,000 and carrying Ohio by a landslide. | ||
By mid-March, analysts concluded that Clinton's chances to win the nomination in the face of Obama's growing lead in delegates were narrowing and her hopes rested on success in three criteria. First was the need to win big in Pennsylvania primary in April, allowing her to claim 9 of the 10 largest states in an argument that will impress superdelegates. | By mid-March, analysts concluded that Clinton's chances to win the nomination in the face of Obama's growing lead in delegates were narrowing and her hopes rested on success in three criteria. First was the need to win big in Pennsylvania primary in April, allowing her to claim 9 of the 10 largest states in an argument that will impress superdelegates. She did win, but the superdelegates remained quiet. Second she has to come close in the popular vote in the primaries, but by May 7 is now 710,000 behind in official primaries, 50% to 47%. Even adding in Florida and Michigan leaves her 88.000 votes behind. Only six small states have yet to vote.<ref> See details at [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html 2008 Democratic Popular Vote]</ref> Her efforts to schedule re-do primaries in Michigan and Florida have failed. Some compromise will have to be reached to avoid alienating Democrats in those states, but even if Clinton is awarded a few more delegates than Obama it will not close the delegate gap or the vote-count gap. Finally she has to exploit some new issue that will shake Obama's standing among superdelegates. Her supporters believe that the uproar regarding anti-American rhetoric of Obama's long-time spiritual advisor the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. might be the breakthrough issue she needs, but with heightened racial tensions inside the Democratic party, the race card has to be played carefully. After a 6-week campaign in which Clinton was outspent 2:1 by Obama, she scored a smashing 9-point victory in Pennsyslvania, keeping her chances alive a little longer. Democratic leaders by May 7 could no longer see a path that would gibve her the nomination and many advised Clinton to step aside lest she damage the party and her own future possibilities as a candidate in 2012 or 2016. <ref>Dan Balz, "Decision Time for Clinton," [http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/05/07/by_dan_balz_hillary_clinton.html?hpid=topnews ''Washington Post'' May 8, 2009]; Adam Nagourney, "Clinton Facing Narrower Path to Nomination," [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/20/us/politics/20memo.html?ref=politics&pagewanted=print ''New York Times,'' Mar. 20, 2008]; </ref> | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#E6E6FF; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 92%;" | {|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#E6E6FF; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 92%;" | ||
|<center><B><big>Democratic Candidate:</big><BR><U><big>Barack Obama</big></U></b></center><BR> | |<center><B><big>Democratic Candidate:</big><BR><U><big>Barack Obama</big></U></b></center><BR> | ||
[[Barack Obama]], Senator from Illinois since 2005, | [[Barack Obama]], Senator from Illinois since 2005, presents himself as a post-racial, post-partisan contender of universal appeal, promising to end the old politics and bring the country together in bipartisan fashion. He appeals strongly to youth and stresses his early opposition to the war in Iraq. Making "change" his central campaign theme and downplaying race, Obama, a charismatic speaker, argues "We can't afford to settle for the same old politics." In late 2007 he repeatedly attacked Clinton for her 2002 vote supporting war against Iraq, and for her ties to lobbies and old-fashioned politics.<ref>"Senator Obama's victory speech [in Iowa] was a concise oratorical gem. No candidate in either party can move an audience like he can.... He's...charismatic." Bob Herbert, "The Obama Phenomenon," ''The New York Times'', Jan. 5, 2008; Obama Dec 27. 2007 speech at [http://www.barackobama.com/2007/12/27/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_38.php Obama official website]; Jonathan Greenberger, [http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/05/obama_slams_cli.html ABC News, May 17, 2007 report]</ref> Clinton responded by hammering away at Obama's inexperience and charged he substituted rhetoric for action. Bill Clinton, noting that Obama and his wife recorded similar voting records in the Senate, snapped that Obama was engaging in a "fairy tale" regarding Iraq, a point of ridicule that bothered Black leaders and increased racial polarization among Democrats.<ref>Kristin Jensen and Julianna Goldman, "Clinton, Obama Battle Makes for Partisan Politics Without Unity," [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aCFsI_V1G5i8&refer=home Bloomberg News, Jan. 10, 2008]</ref> | ||
Obama raised $103 million in 2007 and spent $85 million, and raised a record setting $32 million in January 2008. In terms of his Senate voting, he moved 15 places to the left in 2007, ranking as the most-liberal member of the U.S. Senate. In 2006, he had been the 16th-most-liberal senator.<ref> Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" [http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/ ''National Journal,'' Jan. 31, 2008]</ref> Obama's popularity is strongest among younger and better educated voters. He is currently dominating the African American vote, which comprises about 20% of the Democratic primary vote nationwide, and 30-50% in the deep South, notably as South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia. However Clinton's husband [[Bill Clinton]] has long been popular in the black community and she has received many high profile endorsements. | Obama raised $103 million in 2007 and spent $85 million, and raised a record setting $32 million in January 2008. In terms of his Senate voting, he moved 15 places to the left in 2007, ranking as the most-liberal member of the U.S. Senate. In 2006, he had been the 16th-most-liberal senator.<ref> Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" [http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/ ''National Journal,'' Jan. 31, 2008]</ref> Obama's popularity is strongest among younger and better educated voters. He is currently dominating the African American vote, which comprises about 20% of the Democratic primary vote nationwide, and 30-50% in the deep South, notably as South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia. However Clinton's husband [[Bill Clinton]] has long been popular in the black community and she has received many high profile endorsements. | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
Obama won a landslide in the South Carolina primary by sweeping 78% of the the blacks vote and 25% of the whites, giving him 55% overall to 27% for Clinton and 18% for Edwards. Analysts point out that the upshot may be that Obama is typecast as the "black candidate" with a weak appeal to Hispanics as the contest heads to states where blacks comprise less than 25% of the primary voters. As political scientist Larry Sabato noted, "A few carefully chosen words and framing angles [by the Clintons] have transformed Obama from the post-racial, post-partisan contender of universal appeal into a more typical African-American candidate, who is much less intrinsically attractive to whites and Hispanics." On Tsunami Tuesday the outcome was a virtual tie in terms of votes and delegates. <ref> Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-carolina27jan27,0,3866781.story ''Los Angeles Times'' Jan. 27, 2008]; Larry Sabato, [http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=LJS2008012401 ''Sabato's Crystal Ball'' - Vol. VI#3 Jan 24, 2008.] </ref> | Obama won a landslide in the South Carolina primary by sweeping 78% of the the blacks vote and 25% of the whites, giving him 55% overall to 27% for Clinton and 18% for Edwards. Analysts point out that the upshot may be that Obama is typecast as the "black candidate" with a weak appeal to Hispanics as the contest heads to states where blacks comprise less than 25% of the primary voters. As political scientist Larry Sabato noted, "A few carefully chosen words and framing angles [by the Clintons] have transformed Obama from the post-racial, post-partisan contender of universal appeal into a more typical African-American candidate, who is much less intrinsically attractive to whites and Hispanics." On Tsunami Tuesday the outcome was a virtual tie in terms of votes and delegates. <ref> Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-carolina27jan27,0,3866781.story ''Los Angeles Times'' Jan. 27, 2008]; Larry Sabato, [http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=LJS2008012401 ''Sabato's Crystal Ball'' - Vol. VI#3 Jan 24, 2008.] </ref> | ||
After Tsunami Tuesday, Obama won 11 straight contests, carrying major states like Virginia, Maryland and Wisconsin by landslides, and reducing Clinton's once formidable coalition to a narrow lead among white women and Latinos. She rebuilt her coalition in Texas and | After Tsunami Tuesday, Obama won 11 straight contests, carrying major states like Virginia, Maryland and Wisconsin by landslides, and reducing Clinton's once formidable coalition to a narrow lead among white women and Latinos. She rebuilt her coalition in Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania, equalizing the race in early March. Meanwhile Obama was embarrassed when a top foreign policy advisor resigned after calling Clinton a monster, when attention focused on an Obama business partner and fundraiser on trial in Chicago on criminal charges, and the diplomatic episode in which Obama's top economic advisor told Canadian officials that Obama's attacks on the NAFTA trade agreement represented campaign rhetoric. | ||
Even sharper attacks were directed at the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. of Chicago, who was Obama's minister and spiritual advisor for 20 years. Obama opponents circulate videos of Wright's slashing attacks on whites and his ridicule and hatred of America as a nation. Obama finally in mid-March disavowed Wright, but | Even sharper attacks were directed at the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. of Chicago, who was Obama's minister and spiritual advisor for 20 years. Obama opponents circulate videos of Wright's slashing attacks on whites and his ridicule and hatred of America as a nation. Obama finally in mid-March disavowed Wright, but his long-time close association with Wright proved a major campaign issue for Clinton. Polls in March showed him significantly damaged by the Wright connection, losing support among the independents who formed a critical part of his base. Republican strategists predict that Wright's rage-filled sermons, in which the United Church of Christ minister declares "God damn America", blames American foreign policy for the [[9-11 Attack]], criticises Israel and levels racist insults against the Clintons, could represent a powerful weapon against Obama in the fall. In a major speech on March 18 Obama repudiated Wright but attributed his anger to lingering racism in America; Obama conceded that he knew Wright "to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy" and that he had heard controversial remarks in church. Wright himelf went on national television to repeat his rhetoric and criticize Obama, forcing Obama to decisively repudiate Wright. About half of North Carolina Democrats said the Wright issue mattered to them, and they voted decisively for Senator Clinton. In the week before the media frenzy over Wright, Obama and McCain were essentially tied among all voters in Rasmussen polls; two days after Obama’s speech, McCain had opened a seven-point lead over Obama. Significantly, McCain had pulled slightly ahead among unaffiliated voters. McCain enjoys unified support from Republican voters while Obama only attracts 65% of Democratic votes at this time.<ref> Tim Reid, "Polls show Barack Obama damaged by link to Reverend Jeremiah Wright," [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3591359.ece ''(London) Times Online'' Mar. 21, 2008]; Rasmussen reports, "The Impact of Pastor Wright and THE SPEECH on Election 2008," [http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/the_impact_of_pastor_wright_and_the_speech_on_election_2008 March 20, 2008] </ref> At a deeper level, Obama has had trouble reaching white working classs Democrats, who voted heavily against him in April and May primaries, and tell pollsters they may vote for McCain in the fall or just stay home. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
* [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/new_jersey/new_jersey_republican_presidential_primary New Jersey: McCain 43, Romney 29] | * [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/new_jersey/new_jersey_republican_presidential_primary New Jersey: McCain 43, Romney 29] | ||
* [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ca/california_republican_primary-258.html California: McCain 33, Romney 24] | * [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ca/california_republican_primary-258.html California: McCain 33, Romney 24] | ||
===Later primaries=== | ===Later primaries=== | ||
Line 286: | Line 281: | ||
In his 9th and 10th straight victories against a fading Clinton, Obama scored landslides in icy Wisconsin, 58%-41%, and in sunny Hawaii on February 19. Obama's win raised new doubts about the Clinton campaign's strategy of casting the Illinois senator as a candidate whose soaring rhetoric masks a lack of preparation for the presidency. Analysts noted that Obama was now winning large majorities of white men, reducing Clinton to her core of white women and Hispanic voters. In Wisconsin white women voted for her by a slim 52%-47%, while Obama amassed a fat margin among white men, 63%-34%. Voters under 30 showed unusually high turnout rates as they rallied to Obama, 70%-26%.<ref> see [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226015 Wisconsin Dem exit poll]</ref> Clinton did carry the dairy state's white Democrats by 51%-48%, but they comprised barely half the voters in the primary, which was open to Republicans and Independents. | In his 9th and 10th straight victories against a fading Clinton, Obama scored landslides in icy Wisconsin, 58%-41%, and in sunny Hawaii on February 19. Obama's win raised new doubts about the Clinton campaign's strategy of casting the Illinois senator as a candidate whose soaring rhetoric masks a lack of preparation for the presidency. Analysts noted that Obama was now winning large majorities of white men, reducing Clinton to her core of white women and Hispanic voters. In Wisconsin white women voted for her by a slim 52%-47%, while Obama amassed a fat margin among white men, 63%-34%. Voters under 30 showed unusually high turnout rates as they rallied to Obama, 70%-26%.<ref> see [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226015 Wisconsin Dem exit poll]</ref> Clinton did carry the dairy state's white Democrats by 51%-48%, but they comprised barely half the voters in the primary, which was open to Republicans and Independents. | ||
March 4 was the the next critical date for Clinton, as she scored victories in Ohio (161 delegates) and Texas (228 delegates). After a long hiatus, in which Obama raised far more money and outspent her heavily in TV ads, Clinton came back with a decisive win in | March 4 was the the next critical date for Clinton, as she scored victories in Ohio (161 delegates) and Texas (228 delegates). After a long hiatus, in which Obama raised far more money and outspent her heavily in TV ads, Clinton came back with a decisive win in Pennsylvania on April 22. However on May 6 Obama won by landslide margins in North Carolina, and held Clinton to a one-point victory in Indiana. The final six small states with 217 delegates will finish the primary season by June 3. | ||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226001/ Ohio Dem. exit polls] | |||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226009/ Texas Dem. exit polls] | |||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226004 Pennsylvania Dem. exit polls] | |||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225999/ North Carolina Dem. exit polls] | |||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225979/ Indiana Dem. exit polls] | |||
==Enthusiasm== | ==Enthusiasm== |
Revision as of 20:27, 7 May 2008
Template:TOC-right The United States will hold its 55th quadrennial presidential election on November 4, 2008. The rules are very complicated, and the race is long and expensive; the contenders by late March had already spent some $800 million seeking the party nomination, with Republican (GOP) contenders spending somewhat less than the Democrats.
The Democpratic contenders are Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, who leads Senator Hillary Clinton of New York; all the other serious contenders have dropped out. After her victories in the Texas Ohio and Pennsylvania primaries, and Obama's troubles with his own minister, Obama's lead over Clinton among Democrats nationwide plunged from 10% to 0%, 45% to 45%, but Obama won big in the North Carolina primary on May 6 and held Clinton to a 1% win in Indiana. Obama has 155 more delegates (1848 versus 1693) to the national convention in Denver in late August, where a majority of 2024 will be neded to win the nomination.[1] They faced off in the inconclusive "Tsunami Tuesday" primaries in 21 states on Feb. 5, and the popular vote was almost exactly 50%-50%. However Obama won the next eleven contests in a row and gained the "momentum" that impressed observers and worried the Clinton camp. Repeatedly the Clinton campaign was on the verge of collapse, but she came back with stunning wins in New Hampshire in January, California and Massachusetts in February, Texas and Ohio in March, and Pennsylvania in April. She was unable to keep up the pace in May, as she was heavily outspent and her treasury was empty; indeed Clinton has been loaning herself over $1 million a week, while Obama's fundraising had taken in unprecedented sums. On the other hand, of the six largest states, Obama carried his home state of Illinois, while Clinton carried the others five by sizeable margins. Clinton supporters argue Obama would be too weak in the critical large states in November, especially in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Although Obama will be close to a majority, there are only a few primaries left and neither candidate will be able to secure a majority of the elected delegates before the convention, so the decision will be made by the unelected "superdelegates" who comprise 18% of the convention delegates. They are 796 lawmakers, governors and state and local party officials who, since a rules change in 1982, automatically become delegates and can vote any way they wish. By May 7, Clinton had support from 271 superdelegates and Obama had 260, with the remaining 265 uncommitted but under heavy pressure from the candidates. The regular delegates favored Obama 1588 to 1422, primarily because of his overwhelming success in caucus states, where his well-educated base has proven highly effective.[2]
Serious confusion surrounded the delegations from Michigan and Florida, which the National Committee refuses to seat. Neither candidate campaigned in either state, but primaries were held and Clinton won them and wants those delegates, or a new election. Democrats in Florida, especially, are embittered by being shut out of the convention, which may shift this closely contested state to McCain.[3]
ABC News concluded in mid February that by all objective measures, Obama had become the Democratic frontrunner: he has more money, momentum, enthusiasm, and delegates. "Obama had his most impressive night of the competition, not just in the size of his victory margins but in the breadth of support he attracted from men and women, young voters and old, African Americans and whites," concluded Dan Balz and Tim Craig in The Washington Post. "The results left Clinton, the one-time front-runner for the Democratic nomination, in a deep hole....Obama's winning streak, his large margins and the prospect of more victories next week put Clinton in a tenuous position, despite the close delegate competition."[4]
The Republicans gave victory to Arizona Senator John McCain in most of the primaries, and national leaders have rallied to his cause. He gained a majority of delegates on March 4, and his opponents have dropped out and endorsed him. The right wing of the party, led by radio talk show hosts, was angry with McCain, who has been a maverick and appeals especially to moderates and independents, and even to many Democrats as well, but seemed in April to be more accepting oh ist candidacy. On Tsunami Tuesday McCain polled 41% to 31% for Mitt Romney and 21% for Mike Huckabee. Romney sought the support of the most conservative Republicans, but shared that base with Huckabee, who was strongest among evangelicals. Romney won 273 delegates but dropped out of the race on Feb. 7 and later endorsed McCain.[5]
Each party will officially name its ticket at its national convention in late August in Denver for the Democrats and early September in St. Paul, Minnesota, for the GOP. The GOP convention will be a nominal affair controlled by McCain, and observers expect Obama will have a majority by some time in June.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg had been making preparations for the possibility of becoming an independent candidate. As a multi-billionaire he has the capacity to finance his own campaign without outside contributions or federal matching funds. In March he announced he would not run.
This election will select the 44th President of the United States and the 47th Vice President.[6] Their terms will begin Jan. 20, 2009. President George W. Bush, who has served two terms, is ineligible to run. Vice President Dick Cheney has long said he would not run. No one close to the Bush administration is in the race, and it has not favored any candidate.
Polls in March 2008 show a competitive November election with Clinton slightly behind McCain, and Obama tied with McCain. Analysts expect the Democrats to do especially well in Senate races.[7]
Democrats in 2007
In the Democratic race, throughout 2007 Clinton had a wide lead over Obama and Edwards, but Obama gained rapidly in early 2008, while Edwards faded.
Democratic Contenders
|
|
Republicans in 2007
- See also: U.S. Republican Party
As President Bush is constitutionally ineligible to seek another term and Vice President Dick Cheney has announced that he will not seek the Republican presidential nomination, the Republican field wide was open for the nomination. Various politicians began exploratory committees, fundraising efforts, and other preliminary activities to determine if they had the support they needed to run.
By September 2007, the leaders were former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, and Arizona Senator John McCain, who dropped sharply from his leading position after endorsing immigration reform.
Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee entered as a dark horse but shot to the top rank in December 2007, and won the Iowa caucus. His base is primarily evangelical Christians, who are about 35% of the GOP vote, but he does quite poorly among other segments of the Republican party. By mid-January 2008 Thompson and Giuliani were doing poorly, and both dropped out in late January. Romney dropped out after a poor showing in the February 5th primaries.
Minor candidates who entered but dropped out are Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo, former Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, former Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore and former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson, and California Representative Duncan Hunter. Other candidates who considered running who did not enter include former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel, and former New York Governor George Pataki.
GOP Contenders
|
|
Withdrawn Candidates
The Republican primaries shows a contest in turmoil, which may indicate the splintering of the Reagan coalition of social conservatives, the religious right, national-defense hawks, and advocates of low taxes. McCain started with a large lead but collapsed in the spring, because of grass roots opposition to his liberal stance on immigration, and bad financial strategy that left the campaign broke. But McCain soldiered on, making a comeback in early January, 2008, and winning the New Hampshire primary by 37%-32% for Romney. Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York, used his heroic image from the 9-11 Attack, and promise of a strong counter-terrorism policy, to vault to the lead in mid-2007, despite moderate social policies that the large conservative wing disliked. In early December, however, his negatives were catching up and he fell from the 30% to the 20% level nationally, and ran a weak fourth in New Hampshire at 9%. His strategy involves a comeback in the Florida primary.[34] Hollywood actor and former senator Fred Thompson entered the race late, but appealed to many conservatives looking for another Ronald Reagan. His ineffective campaign style led to a steady erosion of support; he polled 1% in New Hampshire and dropped out after a weak third-place in South Carolina. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, by reversing previous moderate positions, suddenly became a hard-line conservative spokesman. His Mormon religion, however, caused distrust among the religious conservatives who bulk large in some primaries. Romney's strategy was to pour millions of dollars (much of it his personal money) into Iowa and New Hampshire, hoping that victories there on January 3 and 8, 2008, would generate massive favorable publicity. That publicity supposedly would propel him into a dominant position in the Super Tuesday primaries on Feb. 5, 2008, when 45% of the delegates will be chosen.
Every prediction and game plan was shattered in November, when Mike Huckabee, a little known former governor of Arkansas, shot to the top of the polls and won in Iowa. His base comprises evangelical Christians, who comprise 35% of national GOP voters. Evangelicals comprise 48%-68% of Republicans in the South and border states, 47% in Iowa, and only 11% in New Hampshire. They are 33% in Michigan, 29% in Florida, 27% in California and 14% in New York.[35]
|
|
The candidates in primaries and caucuses
For daily updates on the polls see [11]
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
The issues Democrats care about heightened voter turnout, but they have not differentiated the candidates. That is, there is very little correlation between which issues Democrats see as most important and who they have voted for. Thus health care is mentioned by 20-25% of Democrats as a top concern, but they split their votes same way as Democrats who do not rank the issue highly. For the Democrats personal qualities have been far more influential.[53]
Issues have mattered more for Republicans. The Iraq issue hurt McCain in summer 2007, but started to help him in the fall when the public sensed gains in the war there due to the "surge" McCain championed. McCain also gains among Republicans who criticize Bush's handling of the economy, while those who praise Bush support Romney. Immigration has been Romney’s best issue, but the constituency viewing it as a high priority has been too small to carry a primary for him. In Florida, Romney had a 43% to 25% edge over McCain among voters who said immigration is the most important issue; however, they constituted only 16% of the voters.[54]
Mechanics
The nomination process for the two main parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, is significantly more complex than the process at the general election. For most of the history of the United States, each party nominated its candidate at its national convention in the summer before the election. However, the process for selecting the delegates (the people who vote on the nomination) to the convention has changed over time, and differ for each state and each party.[55]
Most states use primaries, which are ordinary secret-ballot elections. Some primaries are open only to party members; in others like New Hampshire, registered independents can vote in either party's primary. Some states do not record party preference in registration; in those states, voters can choose to vote in either primary.
In the 19th century all states used local caucuses and a state convention. Progressives created the direct primary system in 1900 to break the power of state party organizations. The states that rejected primaries in the 1900s and 1970s continue to use caucuses that elect delegates to a state convention, which in turn selects the delegates to the national convention. The best-known caucus state is Iowa, whose caucuses are traditionally the first in the nominating process.
In Iowa voters to go to a local school or meeting place; Republicans sign in with their vote and leave. Democrats must spend an hour or two in a "caucus" to register their preference. Supporters of candidates with under 15% at that caucus move to another candidate. The Democratic Iowa caucus is a mixture of discussion, debating, a little horse-trading, and some consensus-building between neighbors. Anything can happen, but the media will report on the distribution of support at at the end of the evening. The actual national delegates in Iowa will be chosen months later at the state convention.
The Democratic Party rules require that delegates are awarded to the candidate in proportion to their votes in each congressional district in the primary. In addition the Democrats have "superdelegates" who are party officials who automatically become delegates. The Republicans allow a broader variety of rules among the states. Several states (Florida, with a Jan. 29 primary, and New York and New Jersey with primaries on Feb. 5) have "winner take all" rules that magnify their importance. California awards 11 of 170 delegates to the statewide plurality winner, and the remaining 159 as winner-take-all per congressional district.
Third parties choose their candidates at their own, smaller conventions that receive little coverage.
The nomination campaign will have three stages. In January, come the preliminaries, with attention focused on the Iowa caucus (Jan. 3) and the New Hampshire primary (Jan 8), along with contests in Michigan, South Carolina and Florida. Then comes Super Tuesday Feb 5, with 40% of the delegates chosen. After that a string of primaries will be held, which will become increasingly important if the races become deadlocked on Feb. 5. The nominees could possibly be undecided until the national conventions in August/September.
Interest groups
Labor unions
The labor union movement, which itself is split into two camps, has divided its support between Clinton and Obama. Clinton has 12 endorsements from unions affiliated with the AFL-CIO -- the nation's largest labor federation -- as well as the United Farm Workers from the rival Change To Win labor federation. However Obama in mid-February won three of the largest unions (all from Change to Win), The Teamsters (1.4 million members), the United Food and Commercial Workers (comprising 1.3 million supermarket workers and meatpackers) and the Service Employees International Union (1.9-million members). He also has two AFL-CIO unions, the Transport Workers Union and the United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters. Unions and other interest groups have spent far more money so far for Clinton. Two AFL-CIO unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers, have spent nearly $4 million for Clinton.[56]
The New Deal Coalition forged by Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s dominated national politics until the mid-1960s. One key reason was the close alliance of the party with labor unions. Since the 1960s, however, union membership has fallen by 2/3. In the 1980s unions came under assault from business and the party was unable to help them. Unions in recent years have increased their activism in the election cycle, especially in terms of funding and get-out-the-vote campaigns.
In 2004 and 2006, unions spent a combined $561 million to help elect their preferred candidates (most of them Democrats). That is nearly a 50% increase over the $381 million spent on the previous two campaigns. However they are still outspent by business; in 2000, companies were responsible for three times as much spending as unions. By the 2006 election, companies and their employees spent $491 million on elections, compared with $264 million for labor unions. Labor spent $32 million on its own mailings and television and radio commercials for the 2004 and 2006 elections, a nearly fivefold jump over the previous four years. Polls show 74% of voters who belong to an AFL-CIO-affiliated union voted for the congressional candidate endorsed by their union in 2006, up from 70% in 2004 and 68% in 2002.[57]
Candidates for the nomination
|
|
Minor parties
Numerous minor parties run candidates, usually getting under 1% of the vote. Perennial candidate Ralph Nader announced in February 2008 he planned to run. He was an on-again, off-again candidate in 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004. Many Democrats blame his 2.7% showing in 2000 for Al Gore's loss that year. In 2004 Nader received 0.4% of the vote.
Current newspaper and magazine reports
External links
- exit polls, from MSNBC
- Delegate counts for major candidates; upcoming schedule
- Campaign journalism, statistical reports on media coverage
notes
- ↑ See the summary, updated daily, at Real Clear Politics
- ↑ See http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html
- ↑ Jay Cost, "What Will Happen with Florida?" RealCrearPolitics March 14, 2008
- ↑ quoted at ABC News, "The Note" Feb. 13. 2008
- ↑ See Real Clear Politics and the MSNBC results, updated daily
- ↑ The presidential candidate tells the convention whom to select as VP. Rarely, as in 1956, the convention is allowed to vote for its own choice of VP.
- ↑ It is much too early to predict the November election, but the national match-ups are used to gauge the electability of candidates. See Real Clear Politics summary of national match-ups and [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update Rasmussen Reports, "Election 2008: Electoral College Update: Democrats 284 Republicans 216 Toss-Up 38," Feb. 20, 2008
- ↑ see [1]
- ↑ quoted (London) Telegraph Dec-9-2007
- ↑ Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" National Journal, Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ Kristin Jensen and Julianna Goldman, "Clinton, Obama Battle Makes for Partisan Politics Without Unity," Bloomberg News, Jan. 10, 2008
- ↑ See NBC report at [2], and CNN report at [3]; see for detailed exit polls
- ↑ Ben Smith, "Racial tensions roil Democratic race," Politico Jan 11, 2008
- ↑ Michael Luo, Jo Becker and Patrick Healy, "Spending by Clinton Campaign Worries Supporters." New York Times Feb. 22, 2008
- ↑ Rick Klein and Sarah Amos, "Bill Clinton: Texas Could Be Hillary's Last Stand," ABC News Feb 20, 2008
- ↑ See details at 2008 Democratic Popular Vote
- ↑ Dan Balz, "Decision Time for Clinton," Washington Post May 8, 2009; Adam Nagourney, "Clinton Facing Narrower Path to Nomination," New York Times, Mar. 20, 2008;
- ↑ "Senator Obama's victory speech [in Iowa] was a concise oratorical gem. No candidate in either party can move an audience like he can.... He's...charismatic." Bob Herbert, "The Obama Phenomenon," The New York Times, Jan. 5, 2008; Obama Dec 27. 2007 speech at Obama official website; Jonathan Greenberger, ABC News, May 17, 2007 report
- ↑ Kristin Jensen and Julianna Goldman, "Clinton, Obama Battle Makes for Partisan Politics Without Unity," Bloomberg News, Jan. 10, 2008
- ↑ Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" National Journal, Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3134308.ece
- ↑ See NBC report at [4], and CNN report at [5]
- ↑ Carrie Budoff Brown, "Obama faces off against both Clintons," POLITICO Jan 20, 2008
- ↑ Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," Los Angeles Times Jan. 27, 2008; Larry Sabato, Sabato's Crystal Ball - Vol. VI#3 Jan 24, 2008.
- ↑ Tim Reid, "Polls show Barack Obama damaged by link to Reverend Jeremiah Wright," (London) Times Online Mar. 21, 2008; Rasmussen reports, "The Impact of Pastor Wright and THE SPEECH on Election 2008," March 20, 2008
- ↑ . Evangelicals comprise 48%-68% of Republicans in the South and border states, 47% in Iowa, and only 11% in New Hampshire. Andrew Kohut, "The G.O.P.’s Unanswered Question," New York Times Jan. 11, 2008
- ↑ See criticism reported by Jennifer Rubin, "Romney and Huckabee: Club for Growth Comparisons," from Human Events Aug. 24, 2007
- ↑ Dan Balz, "Huckabee's Rise and Rise," Washington Post Dec. 10, 2007; Michael D. Shear and Juliet Eilperin, "Suddenly, Huckabee Is in Romney's Rearview Mirror," Washington Post Nov. 25, 2007; "Shields and Brooks Mull Iowa Election Push, Baseball Scandal" PBS, Dec. 14, 2007
- ↑ Perry Bacon Jr., "The Key in South Carolina: Huckabee Fails to Get Decisive Edge Among Evangelicals," Washington Post Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ David D. Kirkpatrick, "Huckabee’s Money Woes Curtail Campaign," New York Times Jan. 22. 2008
- ↑ Roger Cohen, "McCain's comeback," International Herald Tribune Jan. 16, 2008
- ↑ Roger Cohen, "McCain's comeback," International Herald Tribune Jan. 16, 2008; For voting details see CNN at [6]
- ↑ John M. Broder, "McCain, Long a G.O.P. Maverick, Is Gaining Mainstream Support," New York Times Jan. 28, 2008; Adam Nagourney, "McCain’s Victory in a Party-Only Primary Raises the Hurdles for Romney," New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ For current polls see [7]
- ↑ Andrew Kohut, "The G.O.P.’s Unanswered Question," New York Times Jan. 11, 2008
- ↑ Matthew Continetti, "The Giuliani Implosion: From frontrunner to also-ran in eight short weeks," The Weekly Standard Jan. 21, 2008; Justin Wolfers, "How Rudy's Bet Went Wrong," Wall Street Journal Jan. 23, 2008; Michael Powell and Michael Cooper, "For Giuliani, a Dizzying Free-Fall", New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ Giuliani Exits Race, Endorses McCain, Associated Press, 30 January 2008.
- ↑ Adam Nagourney, "McCain’s Victory in a Party-Only Primary Raises the Hurdles for Romney," New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ In California Romney did much worse than polls predicted (the polls had him tied with McCain but he lost by 8 points). In the closing days he banked heavily on the anti-immigrant argument with intense TV commercials. Romney did well among the 28% who saw illegal immigration as the top issue, beating McCain by 50%-26%. However he lost heavily among the 60% who were more tolerant of immigrants (McCain won them by 50%-28%). Asians and Latinos comprised 19% of the GOP vote in California; most are immigrants or children of immigrants and they voted for McCain over Romney by 48%-21%.
- ↑ Michael Scherer, "Romney's Big Push Nets Little," Time Feb. 06, 2008
- ↑ Zogby data based on 867 likely caucus–goers; see press release 12-30-07 at [8]
- ↑ See NBC report at [9], and CNN report at [10]
- ↑ Michael Luo and Michael Cooper, "Focus Shifts to South Carolina for Romney and Rivals." New York Times Jan 17, 2008
- ↑ Rasmussen Reports, "Michigan Exit Polls Show Challenges for McCain," Jan 16, 2008 online
- ↑ Cathleen Decker and Seema Mehta, "Clinton, Obama reach new level of rancor," Los Angeles Times Jan 22. 2008
- ↑ Christopher Cooper, Valerie Bauerlein and Corey Dade, "New Machine: In South, Democrats' Tactics May Change Political Game," Wall Street Journal Jan. 23 2008
- ↑ See summary results; Alan Fram and Mike Mokrzycki, "McCain won over moderates in S.C." AP Report, Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," Los Angeles Times Jan. 27, 2008; Gary Langer and Brian Hartman, "Black Voters Lift Obama to S.C. Victory; Obama Showing Among White Voters in S.C. Indicates Uphill Battle Ahead," ABC News Jan. 26, 2008
- ↑ Nielsen Co. Press Release, "Romney Leads in Florida Primary Advertising, Nielsen Reports" Jan, 28, 2008
- ↑ Adam Nagourney, "No Quick Knockouts as Races Move to New Terrain," New York Times Jan, 20, 2008; Doyle McManus, "Florida becomes showdown state for GOP," Los Angeles Times Jan. 20, 2008; Elizabeth Holmes, "With a Crowded Republican Field, Candidates Set Sights on Florida," Wall Street Journal Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ Bob Moser, "Fumbling Florida: Have Democrats already blown their biggest swing state," The Nation Dec. 17, 2007, pp 20-24
- ↑ for explanation, maps and statistics, see Rhodes Cook, "Super Tuesday," in Sabato's CrystalBall '08 Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ Andrew Kohut, "A Look at the Numbers," New York Times Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ Andrew Kohut, "A Look at the Numbers," New York Times Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ For details see the unofficial site "Election 2008: Primary, Caucus, and Convention Phase"
- ↑ Jesse J. Holland, "Powerful 1.9M-Member Union Backs Obama," AP Feb. 15, 2008; and Jesse Holland, "Teamsters Union Endorses Obama," AP Feb. 20, 2008; Brody Mullins, T.W. Farnam and John Emshwiller, "Clinton Backers Launch Ads as Obama Gets Union Support," [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120353609734380611.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy Wall Street Journal Feb. 21, 2008
- ↑ Brody Mullins, "Labor Makes Big Comeback In '08 Races; Ramping Up Spending, Unions Get Voters to Polls; The Battle in Nevada; Wall Street Journal Jan. 18, 2008