Talk:World Wide Web: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Konstantin Tchernov
(rewrote section, with techincal details removed temporarily)
 
imported>Konstantin Tchernov
(Major problems)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Technical details==
==Technical details==
I have re-written the "How the web works" section to be a more understandable high-level description.  I will put the technical details about the DNS, TCP/IP, HTML, CSS, etc back into the article some time soon.  Not quite sure where they should go, maybe a sub-category under "how the web works", but I just thought it was important to give a simple description first rather than throwing a whole lot of terminology at the reader.--[[User:Konstantin Tchernov|Konstantin Tchernov]] 07:36, 17 January 2007 (CST)
I have re-written the "How the web works" section to be a more understandable high-level description.  I will put the technical details about the DNS, TCP/IP, HTML, CSS, etc back into the article some time soon.  Not quite sure where they should go, maybe a sub-category under "how the web works", but I just thought it was important to give a simple description first rather than throwing a whole lot of terminology at the reader.--[[User:Konstantin Tchernov|Konstantin Tchernov]] 07:36, 17 January 2007 (CST)
== Major problems ==
What I see that is majorly wrong here (just a very brief quick list):
# Dreadful structure - order of sections is ridiculous
# No in-line citations and hardly any references
# Poor prose, does not flow.  Some inconsistent writing style.  Sometimes boring and technical sometimes full of unnecessary flowery words like "dispersed around the planet in time and space"
# The "basic terms" section is rather strange, I think if needed these terms should be defined in other places as they are mentioned.--[[User:Konstantin Tchernov|Konstantin Tchernov]] 08:21, 17 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 09:21, 17 January 2007

Technical details

I have re-written the "How the web works" section to be a more understandable high-level description. I will put the technical details about the DNS, TCP/IP, HTML, CSS, etc back into the article some time soon. Not quite sure where they should go, maybe a sub-category under "how the web works", but I just thought it was important to give a simple description first rather than throwing a whole lot of terminology at the reader.--Konstantin Tchernov 07:36, 17 January 2007 (CST)

Major problems

What I see that is majorly wrong here (just a very brief quick list):

  1. Dreadful structure - order of sections is ridiculous
  2. No in-line citations and hardly any references
  3. Poor prose, does not flow. Some inconsistent writing style. Sometimes boring and technical sometimes full of unnecessary flowery words like "dispersed around the planet in time and space"
  4. The "basic terms" section is rather strange, I think if needed these terms should be defined in other places as they are mentioned.--Konstantin Tchernov 08:21, 17 January 2007 (CST)