Talk:Wizard of Oz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wrote on this topic as early as 1971 and developed most of the visual links. I originally wrote this article for Wikipedia as RJENSEN; this is a revised version. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:26, 17 November 2007 (CST) | I wrote on this topic as early as 1971 and developed most of the visual links. I originally wrote this article for Wikipedia as RJENSEN; this is a revised version. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:26, 17 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:I think there is a potential here for a subpage regarding the metaphors and interpretations of the Wizard of Oz; mostly because there is so much about the Wizard of Oz in terms of the story, the movie, the production behind the movie, the plot, and the recurring themes which could be discussed in the main article space. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08: | :I think there is a potential here for a subpage regarding the metaphors and interpretations of the Wizard of Oz; mostly because there is so much about the Wizard of Oz in terms of the story, the movie, the production behind the movie, the plot, and the recurring themes which could be discussed in the main article space. Also, it doesn't seem appropriate that there should be conjecture and "potential" analysis in the main article space at all, as it's not factually representative, but interpretive. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08:58, 17 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 17 November 2007
I wrote on this topic as early as 1971 and developed most of the visual links. I originally wrote this article for Wikipedia as RJENSEN; this is a revised version. Richard Jensen 06:26, 17 November 2007 (CST)
- I think there is a potential here for a subpage regarding the metaphors and interpretations of the Wizard of Oz; mostly because there is so much about the Wizard of Oz in terms of the story, the movie, the production behind the movie, the plot, and the recurring themes which could be discussed in the main article space. Also, it doesn't seem appropriate that there should be conjecture and "potential" analysis in the main article space at all, as it's not factually representative, but interpretive. --Robert W King 08:58, 17 November 2007 (CST)