Talk:Video game: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
m (Updated checklist with workgroups from article)
imported>Nick Bagnall
(Discussion about article organization)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 22:02, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 22:02, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
==Organization of the article==
Over the past few weeks I've been gathering excellent quotes and other material from industry bigwigs. I've pulled most of them from books outlining the history of the medium (e.g., Steven Kent's ''Ultimate History of Video Games'' and J.C. Herz's ''Joystick Nation''). There's so much material here that organizing it in a clear, sensible, and easy-to-follow fashion is a difficult task. Should information about the evolution of video games be incorporated into the "History of video games" subsection? E.g., when explaining the decline of coin-operated arcade machine popularity and the rise of home console popularity, the digital narrative developed a finale (an arcade game's raison d'etre is to live in an arcade as long as possible -- the best way to make it last is not to give it an ending).
Second, Citizendium articles are supposed to flow like well-written essays; Wikipedia articles generally do not because the sub-headings can be arranged arbitrarily and it wouldn't make a whit of a difference in the article's readability. Take game development, for example. It's easy to see how it could also be incorporated into a "History of video games" subsection. E.g., games used to be developed by one-man teams; eventually, game companies began establishing divisions of labor. Today teams for a single game can be as large as 120 people. Discussing the video game industry itself presents a similar problem -- there's plenty enough material to justify (or even necessitate) an individual section for the industry, but it too can easily be placed in the context of the medium's history.
I've also been wondering how to incorporate a section discussing the wide range of platforms that support video games and the many genres that video games can be divided into. Wikipedia's "Overview" section sticks out like a sore thumb, so I was considering making the first section "Defining the video game," because there is disagreement about what exactly constitutes a video game both in terms of platform and in terms of genre.
All comments and suggestions would be much appreciated. [[User:Nick Bagnall|Nick]] 22:44, 6 November 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 23:44, 6 November 2007


Article Checklist for "Video game"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup, Games Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 22:02, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Organization of the article

Over the past few weeks I've been gathering excellent quotes and other material from industry bigwigs. I've pulled most of them from books outlining the history of the medium (e.g., Steven Kent's Ultimate History of Video Games and J.C. Herz's Joystick Nation). There's so much material here that organizing it in a clear, sensible, and easy-to-follow fashion is a difficult task. Should information about the evolution of video games be incorporated into the "History of video games" subsection? E.g., when explaining the decline of coin-operated arcade machine popularity and the rise of home console popularity, the digital narrative developed a finale (an arcade game's raison d'etre is to live in an arcade as long as possible -- the best way to make it last is not to give it an ending).

Second, Citizendium articles are supposed to flow like well-written essays; Wikipedia articles generally do not because the sub-headings can be arranged arbitrarily and it wouldn't make a whit of a difference in the article's readability. Take game development, for example. It's easy to see how it could also be incorporated into a "History of video games" subsection. E.g., games used to be developed by one-man teams; eventually, game companies began establishing divisions of labor. Today teams for a single game can be as large as 120 people. Discussing the video game industry itself presents a similar problem -- there's plenty enough material to justify (or even necessitate) an individual section for the industry, but it too can easily be placed in the context of the medium's history.

I've also been wondering how to incorporate a section discussing the wide range of platforms that support video games and the many genres that video games can be divided into. Wikipedia's "Overview" section sticks out like a sore thumb, so I was considering making the first section "Defining the video game," because there is disagreement about what exactly constitutes a video game both in terms of platform and in terms of genre.

All comments and suggestions would be much appreciated. Nick 22:44, 6 November 2007 (CST)