Talk:Unix: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
m (Big Cleanup)
imported>Joshua David Williams
(Emacs and vi?)
Line 12: Line 12:


Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
== Emacs and vi? ==
Emacs and vi shouldn't be listed, should they? This is Unix software, not GNU. Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I've only ever used the free Unix toolkits. --[[User:Joshua David Williams|Joshua David Williams]] 10:47, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:47, 6 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Unix"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Eric M Gearhart 12:08, 31 March 2007 (CDT)--, Petréa Mitchell 11:06, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Should this article dip into "The History of Unix"? Or should that be on its own article? The History of Unix could easily fill up an entire other article... --Eric M Gearhart 12:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT)

Emacs and vi?

Emacs and vi shouldn't be listed, should they? This is Unix software, not GNU. Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I've only ever used the free Unix toolkits. --Joshua David Williams 10:47, 6 April 2007 (CDT)