Talk:Second Life: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mark Jones
(Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?)
imported>Ross A. Perkins
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT), <br />Ross Perkins
|                  by = [[User:Ross A. Perkins|Ross A. Perkins]] 14:13, 29 October 2007 (EST), <br />Mark Jones
}}
}}




==Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?==
==Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?==
I agree that it needs to be cleaned up. I honestly thought others would work on the article, but it hasn't happened in some months. I'm now trying to get it up-to-date and more "encyclopedic." [[User:Ross A. Perkins|Ross A. Perkins]] 14:13, 29 October 2007 (EST)


I think this article needs a full clean up or else be deleted. Does anyone want to vouch for it being kept? An example of something probably not acceptable on Citizendium is the section on [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Second_Life&oldid=100196789#Parody Parody] which references a blog comment purporting to be from Linden Labs giving permission for the parody website to continue. However, there is no reason to accept this was a genuine post from Linden Labs as it could have been posted by anyone. I don't really see this section as encyclopaedic or very useful anyway so I have removed it. There may be others. --[[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT)
I think this article needs a full clean up or else be deleted. Does anyone want to vouch for it being kept? An example of something probably not acceptable on Citizendium is the section on [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Second_Life&oldid=100196789#Parody Parody] which references a blog comment purporting to be from Linden Labs giving permission for the parody website to continue. However, there is no reason to accept this was a genuine post from Linden Labs as it could have been posted by anyone. I don't really see this section as encyclopaedic or very useful anyway so I have removed it. There may be others. --[[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:14, 29 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Second Life"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup, Education Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Ross A. Perkins 14:13, 29 October 2007 (EST),
Mark Jones

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?

I agree that it needs to be cleaned up. I honestly thought others would work on the article, but it hasn't happened in some months. I'm now trying to get it up-to-date and more "encyclopedic." Ross A. Perkins 14:13, 29 October 2007 (EST)


I think this article needs a full clean up or else be deleted. Does anyone want to vouch for it being kept? An example of something probably not acceptable on Citizendium is the section on Parody which references a blog comment purporting to be from Linden Labs giving permission for the parody website to continue. However, there is no reason to accept this was a genuine post from Linden Labs as it could have been posted by anyone. I don't really see this section as encyclopaedic or very useful anyway so I have removed it. There may be others. --Mark Jones 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Life&oldid=194250"