Talk:Second Life: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ross A. Perkins
(Adding checklist)
 
imported>Mark Jones
(Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?)
Line 5: Line 5:
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = Ross Perkins
|                  by = [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT), <br />Ross Perkins
}}
}}
==Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?==
I think this article needs a full clean up or else be deleted. Does anyone want to vouch for it being kept? An example of something probably not acceptable on Citizendium is the section on [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Second_Life&oldid=100196789#Parody Parody] which references a blog comment purporting to be from Linden Labs giving permission for the parody website to continue. However, there is no reason to accept this was a genuine post from Linden Labs as it could have been posted by anyone. I don't really see this section as encyclopaedic or very useful anyway so I have removed it. There may be others. --[[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:51, 28 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Second Life"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup, Education Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Mark Jones 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT),
Ross Perkins

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Article reliability. Keep/clean up/delete?

I think this article needs a full clean up or else be deleted. Does anyone want to vouch for it being kept? An example of something probably not acceptable on Citizendium is the section on Parody which references a blog comment purporting to be from Linden Labs giving permission for the parody website to continue. However, there is no reason to accept this was a genuine post from Linden Labs as it could have been posted by anyone. I don't really see this section as encyclopaedic or very useful anyway so I have removed it. There may be others. --Mark Jones 21:51, 28 October 2007 (CDT)