Talk:Jack Kramer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(category looks good)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(You got it!)
Line 11: Line 11:


I wrote 100% of this article at Wikipedia.  I intend to expand it later. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:51, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
I wrote 100% of this article at Wikipedia.  I intend to expand it later. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 12:51, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Hayford, you got the idea!  I agree with the category, it's Sports Worgroup for sure so I checked that one.  Any of the rest of your sprots articles can be checked "n" as well.  The good news now is that if you return to the workgroup, you will see that your articles [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Category:Sports_Developing_Articles show up] as needing help.  That's the whole idea.  --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 13:02, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:02, 16 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Jack Kramer"
Workgroup category or categories Sports Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Not specified
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Hayford Peirce 12:51, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I wrote 100% of this article at Wikipedia. I intend to expand it later. Hayford Peirce 12:51, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Hayford, you got the idea! I agree with the category, it's Sports Worgroup for sure so I checked that one. Any of the rest of your sprots articles can be checked "n" as well. The good news now is that if you return to the workgroup, you will see that your articles show up as needing help. That's the whole idea. --Matt Innis (Talk) 13:02, 16 May 2007 (CDT)