Talk:Intelligent design movement: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
imported>Stephen Ewen
(→‎God: he, not He?: I made the change.)
Line 38: Line 38:
I'm not terribly sure about this, but isn't the use of capitalised [[pronoun]]s an act of reverence towards the Christian God? Doesn't that mean we're assuming that one exists, particularly as in paragraph two, the words presently refer to the Intelligent Designer? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:52, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm not terribly sure about this, but isn't the use of capitalised [[pronoun]]s an act of reverence towards the Christian God? Doesn't that mean we're assuming that one exists, particularly as in paragraph two, the words presently refer to the Intelligent Designer? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:52, 30 May 2007 (CDT)


:It is standard usage in numerous Bible translations, such as the New American Standard Bible and New King James, to capitalize the pronoun for God. The prefaces make it clear this is an editorial decision to show reverence. However, just as many, such as the New International Version and New Revised Standard Version, go with proper English, "he".  As a matter of style, I would choose the latter, while of course leaving any quotes as-is. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:19, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
:It is standard usage in numerous Bible translations, such as the New American Standard Bible and New King James, to capitalize the pronoun for God. The prefaces make it clear this is an editorial decision to show reverence. However, just as many, such as the New International Version and New Revised Standard Version, go with proper English, "he"; "him".  As a matter of style, I would choose the latter, while of course leaving any quotes as-is. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:19, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::I made the change. ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 04:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:26, 30 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Intelligent design movement"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup, Religion Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Matt Innis (Talk) 19:37, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





In brief:

abc means the form of the title for alphabetization, e.g. "Doherty, John". cat1, cat2 and cat3 are categories; if there is only one category, put it in cat1. cat_check: put "yes" if you want someone to check over the categories status: 0 for approved articles; 1 developed, 2 developing, 3 stub, 4 external underlinked: put "yes" if not enough other articles link to it (click "What links here" at left) cleanup: put "yes" if basic cleanup has been done. by: Names of anyone editing the checklist, in reverse chronological order. Retrieved from "http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Template:Checklist"

Again, where does this initial quotation come from? --Larry Sanger 08:39, 17 May 2007 (CDT)


I have no idea. Will Nesbitt 10:59, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.Gareth Leng 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

National Review article

This article in National Review probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. Yi Zhe Wu 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

Merge with ID

This should be merged with the main ID article. I dropped the biology workgroup--this is mostly politics. Richard Jensen 20:57, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

God: he, not He?

I'm not terribly sure about this, but isn't the use of capitalised pronouns an act of reverence towards the Christian God? Doesn't that mean we're assuming that one exists, particularly as in paragraph two, the words presently refer to the Intelligent Designer? John Stephenson 03:52, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

It is standard usage in numerous Bible translations, such as the New American Standard Bible and New King James, to capitalize the pronoun for God. The prefaces make it clear this is an editorial decision to show reverence. However, just as many, such as the New International Version and New Revised Standard Version, go with proper English, "he"; "him". As a matter of style, I would choose the latter, while of course leaving any quotes as-is. Stephen Ewen 04:19, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
I made the change. ---Stephen Ewen 04:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT)