Talk:Hillary Clinton: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(harping)
imported>Will Nesbitt
Line 15: Line 15:
Senator Clinton has made a good many controversial votes. I'm not sure how one can be qualified as the "most" controversial. [[User:Will Nesbitt|Will Nesbitt]] 08:08, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
Senator Clinton has made a good many controversial votes. I'm not sure how one can be qualified as the "most" controversial. [[User:Will Nesbitt|Will Nesbitt]] 08:08, 21 July 2007 (CDT)
::It's "Most" because that's the one her critics emphasize time and again, far more than any other vote.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 07:16, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
::It's "Most" because that's the one her critics emphasize time and again, far more than any other vote.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 07:16, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
:::Actually, her base emphasizes it. Her critics generally support this vote. Perhaps that does make it the "most" controversial, but that's still a large enough claim to require a reference. [[User:Will Nesbitt|Will Nesbitt]] 09:11, 22 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:11, 22 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Hillary Clinton"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Versuri 07:19, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






"Most" Controversial?

Senator Clinton has made a good many controversial votes. I'm not sure how one can be qualified as the "most" controversial. Will Nesbitt 08:08, 21 July 2007 (CDT)

It's "Most" because that's the one her critics emphasize time and again, far more than any other vote.Richard Jensen 07:16, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
Actually, her base emphasizes it. Her critics generally support this vote. Perhaps that does make it the "most" controversial, but that's still a large enough claim to require a reference. Will Nesbitt 09:11, 22 July 2007 (CDT)