Talk:Gospel of Thomas: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
mNo edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)


How about a link to the text? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:20, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
:How about a link to the text? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:20, 4 June 2007 (CDT)


::Would be great, to do, but the only online "translations" I know of are at least loosely based on the copyrighted edition.  I'll look about anew. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 14:17, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
::Would be great, to do, but the only online "translations" I know of are at least loosely based on the copyrighted edition.  I'll look about anew. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 14:17, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
:I believe you might be thinking of the Gospel of Judas where the copyrighted version has generated some controversy. I have added a link to the "Early Christian Writings" web site section on Thomas which has a wealth of on-line material on the Gospel of Thomas. [[User:James F. Perry|James F. Perry]] 18:44, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
::No, actually -- though I have copies of nearly all the Gnostic gospels in various editions -- but thanks for the link, this looks like an independent translation, just what we needed!  What I had meant earlier was sites such as [http://www.thethomasgospel.com/ this] one, which is largely a paraphrase of translation given in the  Harper & Row hardcover edition of 1959. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 22:41, 4 June 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 26 September 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Apocryphal gospel containing sayings attributed to Jesus. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Religion [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. Russell Potter 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)

How about a link to the text? --Larry Sanger 13:20, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
Would be great, to do, but the only online "translations" I know of are at least loosely based on the copyrighted edition. I'll look about anew. Russell Potter 14:17, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
I believe you might be thinking of the Gospel of Judas where the copyrighted version has generated some controversy. I have added a link to the "Early Christian Writings" web site section on Thomas which has a wealth of on-line material on the Gospel of Thomas. James F. Perry 18:44, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
No, actually -- though I have copies of nearly all the Gnostic gospels in various editions -- but thanks for the link, this looks like an independent translation, just what we needed! What I had meant earlier was sites such as this one, which is largely a paraphrase of translation given in the Harper & Row hardcover edition of 1959. Russell Potter 22:41, 4 June 2007 (CDT)