Talk:Economics/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have re-thought some of this article and tidied it up generally and I am now content to submit it for approval. - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:27, 5 February 2008 (CST) | I have re-thought some of this article and tidied it up generally and I am now content to submit it for approval. - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:27, 5 February 2008 (CST) | ||
On second thoughts there are a number of omissions that - though not of much interest to laymen - should be remedied for the sake of students of economics. Some of them can be dealt with at length in the proposed article on the philosophy of economics, but I think they should get brief references in this article so I plan to deal with them on the ''Tutorials'' subpage. I have started on ''economics as a science'' and I think there should also be something on normative and positive economics. - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:13, 7 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 09:13, 7 February 2008
I have re-thought some of this article and tidied it up generally and I am now content to submit it for approval. - Nick Gardner 08:27, 5 February 2008 (CST)
On second thoughts there are a number of omissions that - though not of much interest to laymen - should be remedied for the sake of students of economics. Some of them can be dealt with at length in the proposed article on the philosophy of economics, but I think they should get brief references in this article so I plan to deal with them on the Tutorials subpage. I have started on economics as a science and I think there should also be something on normative and positive economics. - Nick Gardner 08:13, 7 February 2008 (CST)