Talk:Computer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Markus Baumeister
(added checklist and comment)
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
following here [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)
following here [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)


Shouldn't the article be cleaned up before approval. It has at least still missing pictures (I copied them over from WP) and a strange, unnumbered "18" reference. Some real world references which don't expire (i.e. books) would also be nice. Or are we assuming the editors do that?
Shouldn't the article be cleaned up before approval. It has at least still missing pictures (I copied them over from WP) and a strange, unnumbered "18" reference. Some real world references which don't expire (i.e. books) would also be nice. Or are we assuming the editors do that? --[[User:Markus Baumeister|Markus Baumeister]] 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 
== Moving ==
 
I'm moving this to the singular form of the title.  No reason for it to live at "computers" rather than "computer." --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:24, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:09, 3 January 2007


Article Checklist for "Computer"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





approval on march 15 2007

Toapprove.png
Robert Tito has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Computers Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 03/15/2007.

Discussion Area

following here Robert Tito | Talk 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Shouldn't the article be cleaned up before approval. It has at least still missing pictures (I copied them over from WP) and a strange, unnumbered "18" reference. Some real world references which don't expire (i.e. books) would also be nice. Or are we assuming the editors do that? --Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

Moving

I'm moving this to the singular form of the title. No reason for it to live at "computers" rather than "computer." --Larry Sanger 09:24, 11 March 2007 (CDT)