Sigma algebra: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Hardy
(math notation cleanups. I suspect this article will remain an unsatisfactory stub for a long time unless someone among us gets really energetic.)
imported>Hendra I. Nurdin
Line 4: Line 4:


==Formal definition==
==Formal definition==
Given a set <math>\Omega</math>
Given a set <math>\Omega</math>, let <math>P = 2^\Omega</math> be its power set, i.e. set of all subsets of <math>\Omega</math>.
Let <math>P = 2^\Omega</math> be its power set, i.e. set of all subsets of <math>\Omega</math>.
Then a subset ''F'' &sube; ''P'' (i.e., ''F'' is a collection of subset of <math>\Omega</math>) is a sigma algebra if it satisfies all the following conditions or axioms:
Let ''F'' &sube; ''P'' such that all the following conditions are satisfied:
# <math>\varnothing\in\Omega.</math>
# <math>\varnothing\in\Omega.</math>
# If <math>A\in F </math> then <math> A^c \in F</math>
# If <math>A\in F </math> then <math> A^c \in F</math>

Revision as of 17:47, 20 December 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In mathematics, a sigma algebra is a formal mathematical structure intended among other things to provide a rigid basis for axiomatic probability theory.

Formal definition

Given a set , let be its power set, i.e. set of all subsets of . Then a subset FP (i.e., F is a collection of subset of ) is a sigma algebra if it satisfies all the following conditions or axioms:

  1. If then
  2. If for then

Examples

  • For any set S, the power set 2S itself is a σ algebra.
  • The set of all Borel subsets of the real line is a sigma-algebra.
  • Given the set = {Red, Yellow, Green}, the subset F = {{}, {Green}, {Red, Yellow}, {Red, Yellow, Green}} of is a σ algebra.

See also

References

External links