Scientific misconduct: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*[www.publicationethics.org.uk Committee on Publication Ethics] | *[http://www.publicationethics.org.uk Committee on Publication Ethics] | ||
*CODEX [http://www.codex.vr.se/codex_eng/codex/oversikter/etik/oredlighet.html Professional ethics: research misconduct] | *CODEX [http://www.codex.vr.se/codex_eng/codex/oversikter/etik/oredlighet.html Professional ethics: research misconduct] | ||
*[http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/members/securedDocuments/v25n5p159.pdf Research Integrity and Publication Ethics] ''Science Editor'' '''25''' 159 | *[http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/members/securedDocuments/v25n5p159.pdf Research Integrity and Publication Ethics] ''Science Editor'' '''25''' 159 | ||
Revision as of 10:50, 6 February 2007
The term Scientific misconduct usually refers to fabricating, falsifying, plagiarizing or stealing scientific data and results. Fraud and dishonesty in research involves deliberately misrepresenting the research process, and includes:
- fabrication of data
- theft or plagiarism of data, ideas or methods, from another researcher
- misrepresentation of the research process for example by incorrect use of methodology, dishonest inclusion or exclusion of data, deceptive analysis of data to misrepresent their interpretation, or dishonesty toward granting authorities
- Committee on Publication Ethics
- CODEX Professional ethics: research misconduct
- Research Integrity and Publication Ethics Science Editor 25 159
- Constance Holden C (2002) Planned Misconduct Surveys Meet Stiff Resistance. Science 298 1549 DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1549[1]
- Editorial (2006) Ethics and fraud. Nature 439: 117-118 doi:10.1038/439117a
- Gunsulus CK (2001) Research misconduct, Selected bibliography