Scientific misconduct: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:




*Committee on Publication Ethics [www.publicationethics.org.uk]
*[www.publicationethics.org.uk Committee on Publication Ethics]
*CODEX Professional ethics: research misconduct [http://www.codex.vr.se/codex_eng/codex/oversikter/etik/oredlighet.html]
*CODEX [http://www.codex.vr.se/codex_eng/codex/oversikter/etik/oredlighet.html Professional ethics: research misconduct]
 
*[http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/members/securedDocuments/v25n5p159.pdf Research Integrity and Publication Ethics] ''Science Editor'' '''25''' 159
*Constance Holden C (2002) Planned Misconduct Surveys Meet Stiff Resistance. ''Science'' '''298''' 1549 DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1549[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5598/1549?ck=nck]
*Constance Holden C (2002) Planned Misconduct Surveys Meet Stiff Resistance. ''Science'' '''298''' 1549 DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1549[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5598/1549?ck=nck]
* Editorial (2006) Ethics and fraud.  ''Nature'' '''439''': 117-118 doi:10.1038/439117a
* Editorial (2006) Ethics and fraud.  ''Nature'' '''439''': 117-118 doi:10.1038/439117a
[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7073/full/439117a.html]
[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7073/full/439117a.html]
*Gunsulus CK (2001) Research misconduct, Selected bibliography[http://poynter.indiana.edu/sas/res/misconduct.pdf]
*Gunsulus CK (2001) [http://poynter.indiana.edu/sas/res/misconduct.pdf Research misconduct, Selected bibliography]
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]

Revision as of 10:49, 6 February 2007

The term Scientific misconduct usually refers to fabricating, falsifying, plagiarizing or stealing scientific data and results. Fraud and dishonesty in research involves deliberately misrepresenting the research process, and includes:

  • fabrication of data
  • theft or plagiarism of data, ideas or methods, from another researcher
  • misrepresentation of the research process for example by incorrect use of methodology, dishonest inclusion or exclusion of data, deceptive analysis of data to misrepresent their interpretation, or dishonesty toward granting authorities


[2]