Riemann-Hurwitz formula: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michael Hardy
(various sorts of cleanup. What would one expect a link to field to link to? Something about corn fields, electric fields, visual fields, ....?)
imported>Michael Hardy
(proper bolding)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[algebraic geometry]] the Riemann-Hurwitz formula states that if ''C'', ''D'' are smooth [[algebraic curve]]s, and <math>\scriptstyle f:C\to D</math> is a [[finite map]] of [[degree]] ''d'' then the number of [[branch points]] of ''f'', denoted by ''B'', is given by
In [[algebraic geometry]] the '''Riemann-Hurwitz formula''' states that if ''C'', ''D'' are smooth [[algebraic curve]]s, and <math>\scriptstyle f:C\to D</math> is a [[finite map]] of [[degree]] ''d'' then the number of [[branch points]] of ''f'', denoted by ''B'', is given by


: <math>2 (\mbox{genus}(C)-1)=2d(\mbox{genus}(D)-1)+B. \, </math>
: <math>2 (\mbox{genus}(C)-1)=2d(\mbox{genus}(D)-1)+B. \, </math>

Revision as of 18:58, 28 July 2007

In algebraic geometry the Riemann-Hurwitz formula states that if C, D are smooth algebraic curves, and is a finite map of degree d then the number of branch points of f, denoted by B, is given by

a triangulated gluing diagram for the Riemann sphere, and its pullback to a torus double cover, which is ramified over the vertices of the triangulation

Over a field in general characteristic, this theorem is a consequence of the Riemann-Roch theorem. Over the complex numbers, the theorem can be proved by choosing a triangulation of the curve D such that all the branch points of the map are nodes of the triangulation. One then considers the pullback of the triangulation to the curve C and computes the Euler characteristics of both curves.