Realism (international relations)

From Citizendium
Revision as of 07:49, 2 August 2009 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Realism in foreign policy is a doctrine that assumes that it may be entirely possible to work with otherwise hostile states when matters of common concern are involved, but one of the constraints is that the internal politics of a nation is not a matter of common concern and out of scope for the proposed cooperation. It is also called realpolitik, the German equivalent. While Henry Kissinger is its most visible advocate, he was by no means the originator.

A cynic might liken it to the international version of the Serenity Prayer: "give me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can change, and the wisdom to know the difference."

Hans Morgenthau, indeed, may have articulated it more clearly.[1]

Kissinger had addressed the basic ideas going back to his senior thesis, which eventually became the book, A World Restored, which explored "balance of power" explanations for stability in early 19th century Europe. [2] In the Nixon Administration, his first priority was replacing the containment policy against the Soviet Union and Chinea with détente, or a "lessening of tensions". Detente tends to specific to key issues, where realism has broader scope. It was a change from the containment policy, which expected to restrain and indeed weaken opposing power blocs through economic and psychological warfare. Detente, or the "lessening of tensions", assumed that the opponent could not be significantly weakened, but also accepted they would cooperate on mmaggers of common concern. It is a subset of realism (foreign policy), which further recognizes that states can have reason to cooperate on external policies, but it often would be impractical to change their internal practices.

In The End of History and the Last Man, Francis Fukuyama distinguishes between two kinds of realism:[3]

  • a characteristic of the force-dominated relationship beween "historical" and "post-historical" actors, which he considers accurate
  • an assumption that all states seek to maintain insecurity and to seek power, which he does not consider a natural, objective drive.

References

  1. Hans J. Morgenthau (1978), Six Principles of Political Realism, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (Fifth Edition, Revised ed.), Alfred A. Knopf, pp. 4-15
  2. Henry Kissinger (1973), A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812-1822, Mariner Books, ISBN 0395172292
  3. Francis Fukuyama (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, ISBN 0029109752, pp. 278-279