Open Knowledge Conference/Program/A Year in Review: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(backlink)
Line 6: Line 6:


<!--Add a link back to the page of the session, e.g. [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - Ideas and Culture]] -->
<!--Add a link back to the page of the session, e.g. [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - Ideas and Culture]] -->
[[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010|Back to OKCon 2010 Program]]<br />
[[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - State of the Nation|Back to State of the Nation session]]
[[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - State of the Nation|Back to State of the Nation session]]



Revision as of 19:16, 24 April 2010



Back to OKCon 2010 Program
Back to State of the Nation session

Title

A Year in Review

Authors

Rufus Pollock

Keywords

open data

Abstract

Paste abstract in here.

Notes and comments

Intro from Rufus Pollock:

  • Is a not for profit organisation
  • OKFN is building on history of other orgs, such as
  • Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
  • Open is about technology
  • Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
  • OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
  • Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
  • if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
  • "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
  • Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
  • Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
  • CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
  • "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
  • getting people together to interoperate with data
  • most people suck at data - spreadsheets
  • [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
  • lots of people, not very co-ordinated
  • "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
  • new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
  • bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
  • Exemplars
  • Kforge
  • Public domain works calc
  • opendefinition.org
  • PantonPriciples
  • Open Database Licences
  • OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
  • money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
  • The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
  • these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
  • we are too happy with closed
  • /end
  • Q&A
  • what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
  • OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
  • What about in other countries? How will it pan out for them?
  • UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
  • What about the political motivations?
  • "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
  • Can't put the genie back in the bottle