Epistemology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Epistemology''' is also called '''Theory of Knowledge.'''  A [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline, it deals with broad questions: what is knowledge?  Is certainty required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway?  From what sources--sense-perception, say, or revelation--do we derive knowledge?  Our beliefs can have more or less justification, warrant, or evidence--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge.  So what are they?  Some doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all.  On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such skepticism?
'''Epistemology''' (from Greek ἐπιστήμη, or ''episteme,'' knowledge; and λόγος, or ''logos,'' a study or account) is also called '''Theory of Knowledge.'''  A [[philosophy|philosophical]] discipline, epistemology deals with broad questions: what is [[knowledge]]?  Is [[certainty]] required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway?  From what sources--[[sense-perception]], say, or [[revelation]]--do we derive knowledge?  Our beliefs can have more or less [[justification]], [[warrant]], or [[evidence]]--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge.  So what are they?  Some thinkers doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all.  On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such [[skepticism]]?


[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Philosophy Workgroup]]
[[Category:Philosophy Workgroup]]

Revision as of 08:46, 5 September 2007

Epistemology (from Greek ἐπιστήμη, or episteme, knowledge; and λόγος, or logos, a study or account) is also called Theory of Knowledge. A philosophical discipline, epistemology deals with broad questions: what is knowledge? Is certainty required for knowledge, and what is certainty anyway? From what sources--sense-perception, say, or revelation--do we derive knowledge? Our beliefs can have more or less justification, warrant, or evidence--and these features seem, roughly speaking, required for knowledge. So what are they? Some thinkers doubt that we have any, or very much, knowledge at all. On what grounds can we embrace, or reject, such skepticism?