Talk:Tux/Gallery
 |
according to me this should be approved alongside Tux but open to new pictures in the draft section. Robert Tito | Talk 18:03, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
- Fine by me. Stephen Ewen 19:39, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
- I agree. In my opinion, we should go ahead and approve the gallery for Tux. Greg Woodhouse 20:41, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
<randomness>April 26th.. that's my birthday! :-P</randomness> --Joshua David Williams 08:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Approving galleries
Josuha, Happy birthday.
Rob, if we are approving this gallery then we also need to approve the biology gallery, see Biology/Gallery. Although, we may want to improve the figure legends before we seek approval. Chris Day (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
I think for clarity we either include ***/gallery in the approval of the *** article or not. So far that is obscure - so I opt to play by the book - approve per article unless the editor council decides differently. I will bring it up there however since to me - frankly - it makes no sense to seperately approve an article and na accompanying gallery seperately. By the way have you been looking into the approve template to allow more editors? Robert Tito | Talk 22:46, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
- Makes sense to me to keep the approval as one process for related sub-categories.
- I had not looked into adding more editors. What options would you like? Up to three editors with parameters editor1, editor2 and editor3? Chris Day (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
- 4 max, the 4th makes the approval final - the article then should be approved only the final draft moves will have to take place, the 4th editor should initiate that - or can that be done per template as well? (i.e. mail to constables@ ???) thanks so far Chris, Robert Tito | Talk 00:00, 27 April 2007 (CDT)