Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

From Citizendium
Revision as of 04:08, 8 December 2010 by imported>Stefan Olejniczak (additions)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

For particle physics, this was the problem of determining the state of a fundamental particle (electron, etc.) at any given moment. The problem arises experimentally as, in order to determine the state of any particle, we (the observers) must look at it. In order to see it, we must bombard it with photons. The interaction of photons with the sub-atomic particles changes the state of the particle leading us to the ironic conclusion that it is impossible for an observer to determine experimentally the state of any particle, because there is always an error margin equal to the wavelength of the photon. Though the wavelebngth can be made shorter in order to reduce the error margin, this also disturbs the motion of the measured particle.[1] Thus, for Heisenberg, physicists can only predict the probabilities of where or what the given state of a particle would be.

Fundamental particles thus exist in a fog of probabilities. It was this theorem that led to Einstein's famous quip that "God does not play dice."

The uncertainly principle does not limit the precision with which either the particle's momentum or its position may be measured, but only the precision which with both may be measured simultaneously. This uncertainty is expressed mathematically as

where

indicates uncertainty (that is, variance) in the measurement of position is the uncertainty in the momentum measurement. is Planck's constant.

Applications

In string theory, another constant (C) related to the Planck scale is introduced into the equation. This constant poses a minimal value on the uncertainty with which particles can be located.[2]

In other fields, such as the behavioral sciences, this principle also applies. For anthropologists studying the interactions of social groups, interactions may change as a result of the researcher's presence. For psychologists studying individual behavior, reasons and actions may change because the individual knows he/she is being observed.

References

  1. Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe, 2003: 113
  2. Lee Smolin, Three roads to quantum graviry, 2001: 165