Nuclear power reconsidered/External Links: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Undo revision 868650 by David MacQuigg (talk)) Tag: Undo |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Abbott, D. (2016) "Nuclear Power: Game Over", AQ: Australian Quarterly, 87(4), 8–16,40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24877873 | *Abbott, D. (2016) "Nuclear Power: Game Over", AQ: Australian Quarterly, 87(4), 8–16,40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24877873 | ||
*Sovacool, et al.(2020) Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat Energy 5, 928–935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3 | *Sovacool, et al.(2020) Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat Energy 5, 928–935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3 | ||
*Nordhaus (2021) [https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/on-anti-nuclear-bullshit On Anti-Nuclear Bullshit] | **Nordhaus (2021) [https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/on-anti-nuclear-bullshit On Anti-Nuclear Bullshit] counter to Sovacool's claims. | ||
*Jacobson, M., et.al. (2022) "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage", Renewable Energy, 184, 430-442. https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/21-USStates-PDFs/21-USStatesPaper.pdf | *Jacobson, M., et.al. (2022) "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage", Renewable Energy, 184, 430-442. https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/21-USStates-PDFs/21-USStatesPaper.pdf | ||
*Lovins, Amory (2022) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/26/amory-lovins-energy-efficiency-interview-cheapest-safest-cleanest-crisis | *Lovins, Amory (2022) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/26/amory-lovins-energy-efficiency-interview-cheapest-safest-cleanest-crisis | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 13 July 2022
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
Controversial articles
- Abbott, D. (2016) "Nuclear Power: Game Over", AQ: Australian Quarterly, 87(4), 8–16,40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24877873
- Sovacool, et al.(2020) Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nat Energy 5, 928–935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00696-3
- Nordhaus (2021) On Anti-Nuclear Bullshit counter to Sovacool's claims.
- Jacobson, M., et.al. (2022) "Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage", Renewable Energy, 184, 430-442. https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/21-USStates-PDFs/21-USStatesPaper.pdf
- Lovins, Amory (2022) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/26/amory-lovins-energy-efficiency-interview-cheapest-safest-cleanest-crisis
Anti-nuclear organizations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-nuclear_organizations
Public figures who reconsidered nuclear power
- Stewart Brand, creator of "The Whole Earth Catalog", from the NY Times Business section, 3-23-2022
- Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, from the Guardian, 11-16-2021
- Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and CEO of Tesla, from CNBC on 7/22/2021
- Michael Shellenberger An environmental activist, talk at TEDxDanubia 2019.
- Kirsty Gogan An environmental activist, anti-nuclear "by default" speaking at Alberta Nuclear Power - Calgary Panel.