Talk:Ben Goldacre: Difference between revisions
imported>Ro Thorpe (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→From the other side of the pond: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== From the other side of the pond == | |||
Tom, I'm the first to admit that I don't understand the nuances of British journalism (you have Page 3 girls and we don't), regulation, and the delicate democratic balance among media, politics, and [[interest group]]s. You know I'm strongly opposed to fringe-ish pseudoscience at CZ. | |||
Nevertheless, this article interested me, and I looked a bit farther. Ignoring the activist blogs, I was fascinated by the issues about the BBC investigating its own science reporting [http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/58072,news-comment,news-politics,starter-for-ten-is-bbc-science-too-one-sided]. I'd want to be sure that this article didn't paint Goldacre simply as a wise crusader. The vaccination/MMR matters certainly need coverage, perhaps in their own article -- after all, anti-vaccination comes back to our old friend [[homeopathy]], as well as the autism claims. | |||
I did run across one blog post that simply suggested that Goldacre be called an allopath rather than a physician, to show he was simply an anti-homeopathy propagandist. Ludicrous -- Osler put this to rest, I thought, almost a century ago, but I urge careful and noninflammatory writing here. Let me know how an American Rebel can help. It might even be enough for me to recruit a friend and colleague who carefully qualified as a Son of the American Revolution, and then pointed out that he lives in suburban Toronto, for good historical reason. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:02, 13 August 2010
|
| Metadata here |
From the other side of the pond
Tom, I'm the first to admit that I don't understand the nuances of British journalism (you have Page 3 girls and we don't), regulation, and the delicate democratic balance among media, politics, and interest groups. You know I'm strongly opposed to fringe-ish pseudoscience at CZ.
Nevertheless, this article interested me, and I looked a bit farther. Ignoring the activist blogs, I was fascinated by the issues about the BBC investigating its own science reporting [1]. I'd want to be sure that this article didn't paint Goldacre simply as a wise crusader. The vaccination/MMR matters certainly need coverage, perhaps in their own article -- after all, anti-vaccination comes back to our old friend homeopathy, as well as the autism claims.
I did run across one blog post that simply suggested that Goldacre be called an allopath rather than a physician, to show he was simply an anti-homeopathy propagandist. Ludicrous -- Osler put this to rest, I thought, almost a century ago, but I urge careful and noninflammatory writing here. Let me know how an American Rebel can help. It might even be enough for me to recruit a friend and colleague who carefully qualified as a Son of the American Revolution, and then pointed out that he lives in suburban Toronto, for good historical reason. Howard C. Berkowitz 03:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)