Talk:Hazard and Operability Study: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
m (→‎WP has an article of the same name: Response to Ro Thorpe and Hayford Pierce)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎WP has an article of the same name: for some things in life, no fixed rules apply)
Line 16: Line 16:


:::Since there is no official name for a HAZOP, then neither the WP article title nor this CZ article title is "correct". In fact, there is *no* correct title, but at least mine has a carefully thought out rationale. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 03:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
:::Since there is no official name for a HAZOP, then neither the WP article title nor this CZ article title is "correct". In fact, there is *no* correct title, but at least mine has a carefully thought out rationale. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 03:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
::::I will certainly defer to you on this. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:56, 11 July 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Gallery [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A simple, structured methodology for identifying, evaluating and prioritizing potential hazardous occurrences in an existing process facility or a proposed new facility. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Engineering and Chemistry [Categories OK]
 Subgroup categories:  Chemical Engineering, Emergency management and Environmental Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

WP has an article of the same name

But this article was written from scratch. It is not a WP import. Milton Beychok 21:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Not exactly the same name. WP's is called 'Hazard and operability study'. Ro Thorpe 02:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Isn't the WP title correct? Hayford Peirce 02:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hayford and Ro, I thought about that for quite a while before I chose the title of this article. There is no "official" title. I know that we should not use capitalized words (other than the first word) in titles unless the official name for the title subject uses them (as in American Institute of Chemical Engineers or Anti-Defamation League or Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament). However, since there was no official title available in this case, I made my decision as outlined below.
In about 75 percent of the time in the literature (even in the first sentence of the WP article), the acronym "HAZOP" is used (as is also used in the first sentence of this article). In the other 25 percent of the of the time, the acronym "Hazop" is used. On that basis, I decided to capitalize the first letter of Operating. In other words, if we use the acronym HAZOP as a contraction of "HAZard" and "OPerating", then it is logical (at least in my opinion) to capitalize the "O" in Operating.
Then I thought that "Hazard and Operability" was looked incomplete and that "Hazard and Operability study" looked inconsistent ... so I decided on "Hazard and Operability Study".
Since there is no official name for a HAZOP, then neither the WP article title nor this CZ article title is "correct". In fact, there is *no* correct title, but at least mine has a carefully thought out rationale. Milton Beychok 03:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
I will certainly defer to you on this. Hayford Peirce 03:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Hazard_and_Operability_Study&oldid=791773"