Talk:Kerckhoffs' Principle/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Hayford? Any French translators?)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


==Translation of second principle==
I'd like to take out the first English version given here, leaving the French and the second English version which I think is a better translation. Any comment? Objection? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 02:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to take out the first English version given here, leaving the French and the second English version which I think is a better translation. Any comment? Objection? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 02:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)


Line 6: Line 7:


::I don't speak French, but I think we have some native speakers and many who are fluent. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 02:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
::I don't speak French, but I think we have some native speakers and many who are fluent. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 02:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
:::My take: "It should not depend on secrecy, nor cause inconvenience if it falls into the hands of the enemy." --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 13:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:20, 16 January 2010

This article has a Citable Version.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The principle, formulated by Auguste Kerckhoffs, that security in a cipher should not depend on keeping the details of the cipher secret; it should depend only on keeping the key secret. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Mathematics and Military [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Security
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Translation of second principle

I'd like to take out the first English version given here, leaving the French and the second English version which I think is a better translation. Any comment? Objection? Sandy Harris 02:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

My translation would be "The system must not require secrecy, and having it fall into the enemy's hands should not cause problems." Use that? I prefer it to either of the sourced translations. Do we have any French-speaking editors? Sandy Harris 02:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I don't speak French, but I think we have some native speakers and many who are fluent. Howard C. Berkowitz 02:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
My take: "It should not depend on secrecy, nor cause inconvenience if it falls into the hands of the enemy." --Daniel Mietchen 13:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Kerckhoffs%27_Principle/Draft&oldid=581662"