Talk:Internet Protocol: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Why might it seem there are several similar, even duplicating articles?) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Probably ready for approval) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I have written professional books on addressing and routing; others may want to put them into the bibliography if they see fit. The 1998 book is more of historical interest; although it does consider both IPv4 and IPv6, it also discussed the plethora of proprietary protocols they replaced. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | I have written professional books on addressing and routing; others may want to put them into the bibliography if they see fit. The 1998 book is more of historical interest; although it does consider both IPv4 and IPv6, it also discussed the plethora of proprietary protocols they replaced. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Approval readiness == | |||
Given this is a "core article", with [[IPv4]] and [[IPv6]] arguably major sub-cores under it, and that it also is under the core [[Internet Protocol Suite]] and other architectural articles such as [[locality of addresses]], I'd like it considered for approval. Editors, please consider its level of detail with respect to those other articles. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:28, 17 January 2009
Note that Internet Protocol version 4 also exists. Chris Day 03:32, 9 June 2008 (CDT)
As does Internet Protocol version 6. This article deals with commonalities and requirements for the later version. DNS is a technology complementary to both.
There are more detailed articles under the main IPv6 article, and also on complementary techniques such as DHCP.Howard C. Berkowitz 16:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Reorganization from earlier article
I have this pointing to both IPv4 and IPv6, and removed a good deal of text which tried to explain IP in terms of the Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model, rather than the applicable Internet Protocol Suite. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:43, 14 July 2008 (CDT)
Disclaimer
I do cite several papers and presentations of which I was sole or co-author. All are peer-reviewed and are formally public domain, or, in the case of the presentation, was given to a public forum and no copyright was claimed. Please let me know if there are any concerns.
I have written professional books on addressing and routing; others may want to put them into the bibliography if they see fit. The 1998 book is more of historical interest; although it does consider both IPv4 and IPv6, it also discussed the plethora of proprietary protocols they replaced. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Approval readiness
Given this is a "core article", with IPv4 and IPv6 arguably major sub-cores under it, and that it also is under the core Internet Protocol Suite and other architectural articles such as locality of addresses, I'd like it considered for approval. Editors, please consider its level of detail with respect to those other articles. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)