CZ:Biology Week/PLoS: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(moved content from here)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
Line 10: Line 10:
Main points to make, considering the audience at PLoS Biology:
Main points to make, considering the audience at PLoS Biology:
* What is Biology Week?
* What is Biology Week?
** Give first occurence and details on planned regularity
** Give first occurence (September 22-28, 2008) and details on planned regularity
* Why should readers (scientists, teachers, students, interested public) participate in it?
* Why should readers (scientists, teachers, students, interested public) participate in it?
** What sorts of contributions are possible and/or expected (here, the groups should be addressed separately, though that's not easy within a concise piece of narrative writing)?
** What sorts of contributions are possible and/or expected (here, the groups should be addressed separately, though that's not easy within a concise piece of narrative writing)?

Revision as of 11:21, 5 June 2008

One way to initiate some repetitive interaction between CZ and more traditional venues of scholarly communication like science journals would be a community page article in PLoS Biology (an Open Access journal, and perhaps the most widely read one in biology) describing the concept of Biology Week to a life science audience. The author guidelines for this are here, and previous examples of such community pages include

In order to harness the powers of a wiki for drafting the article, I suggest we do that here, in close collaboration with the CZ:Biology Workgroup and anybody else interested in Biology Week.

Aims of the article

Main points to make, considering the audience at PLoS Biology:

  • What is Biology Week?
    • Give first occurence (September 22-28, 2008) and details on planned regularity
  • Why should readers (scientists, teachers, students, interested public) participate in it?
    • What sorts of contributions are possible and/or expected (here, the groups should be addressed separately, though that's not easy within a concise piece of narrative writing)?
  • Mention other CZ Workgroup weeks, most notably those for Health sciences and Anthropology, as these fields have a large overlap with Biology

Draft

Text

Up to 1200 words.

Image or box?

We can have either an image or a box but perhaps the box might contain an image. I would suggest to go for a box that lists the key properties of CZ with respect to similar projects readers might be familiar with (mainly EB and WP). A good image would probably be of help, and something in the style of Montage2.jpg or Anthropology mural by Stephen Ewen CC-by-sa.jpg would seem appropriate - the field is depicted as a whole, yet its diversity is evident, too. Any idea how we can get the idea of a recurrent Biology week into such a figure?