CZ:Biology Week/PLoS: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+pending decisions) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In order to harness the powers of a wiki for drafting the article, I suggest we do that here, in close collaboration with the [[CZ:Biology Workgroup]] and anybody else interested in Biology Week. | In order to harness the powers of a wiki for drafting the article, I suggest we do that here, in close collaboration with the [[CZ:Biology Workgroup]] and anybody else interested in Biology Week. | ||
===Aims of the article=== | ===Aims of the article=== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
* Mention other CZ Workgroup weeks, most notably those for Health sciences and Anthropology, as these fields have a large overlap with Biology | * Mention other CZ Workgroup weeks, most notably those for Health sciences and Anthropology, as these fields have a large overlap with Biology | ||
* Describe options for integration with other free educational projects | * Describe options for integration with other free educational projects | ||
===Before drafting=== | |||
See [[CZ:Biology_Workgroup/Biology_Week/Pending decisions|Things to be decided upon before first Biology Week]]. | |||
===Draft === | ===Draft === | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 9 June 2008
One way to initiate some repetitive interaction between CZ and more traditional venues of scholarly communication like science journals would be a community page article in PLoS Biology (an Open Access journal, and perhaps the most widely read one in biology) describing the concept of Biology Week to a life science audience. The author guidelines for this are here, and previous examples of such community pages include
- The Costs of Exclusion: Recognizing a Role for Local Communities in Biodiversity Conservation,
- CAMERA: A Community Resource for Metagenomics,
- Peer Review - The Newcomers' Perspective and
- Rethinking Outreach: Teaching the Process of Science through Modeling.
In order to harness the powers of a wiki for drafting the article, I suggest we do that here, in close collaboration with the CZ:Biology Workgroup and anybody else interested in Biology Week.
Aims of the article
Main points to make, considering the audience at PLoS Biology:
- What is Biology Week?
- Give first occurence (September 22-28, 2008) and details on planned regularity
- Why should readers (scientists, teachers, students, interested public) participate in it?
- What sorts of contributions are possible and/or expected (here, the groups should be addressed separately, though that's not easy within a concise piece of narrative writing)?
- Mention other CZ Workgroup weeks, most notably those for Health sciences and Anthropology, as these fields have a large overlap with Biology
- Describe options for integration with other free educational projects
Before drafting
See Things to be decided upon before first Biology Week.
Draft
Text
Up to 1200 words.
Image or box?
We can have either an image or a box but perhaps the box might contain an image.
I would suggest to go for a box that lists the key properties of CZ with respect to similar projects readers might be familiar with (mainly EB and WP). A good image would probably be of help, and something in the style of 
or 
would seem appropriate - the field is depicted as a whole, yet its diversity is evident, too. Any idea how we can get the idea of a recurrent Biology week into such a figure?