Wave-particle duality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk m (copyedits) |
imported>Paul Wormer (Wikilinks; de Broglie posited wave character of *particles*; the Nazi Lenard is very rarely (if ever) called von Lenard; 19th century chemists did not see light as atomic, but matter; added table) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{TOC-right}} | {{TOC-right}} | ||
The debate arguably began in the 17th century with the competing theories of Christiaan Huygens and [[Isaac Newton]]. Huygen's observations led him to a wave theory of light while Newton's observations supported a corpuscular or particle theory. Newton's preeminence as the leading mind in related matters led to the dominance of his theory. | The debate arguably began in the 17th century with the competing theories of [[Christiaan Huygens]] and [[Isaac Newton]]. Huygen's observations led him to a wave theory of light while Newton's observations supported a corpuscular or particle theory. Newton's preeminence as the leading mind in related matters led to the dominance of his theory. | ||
Eventually, subsequent research in the 19th and 20th centuries provided compelling support for both theories—light was found to behave as both a particle and a wave, a characteristic shared by the constituents of solid matter (electrons, atoms and molecules). | Eventually, subsequent research in the 19th and 20th centuries provided compelling support for both theories—light was found to behave as both a particle and a wave, a characteristic shared by the constituents of solid matter (electrons, atoms and molecules). | ||
Wave theory was strongly supported and continued in optics for more than 100 years. However, in chemistry the atomic structure of | Wave theory was strongly supported and continued in optics for more than 100 years. However, in chemistry the atomic structure of matter provided insight into molecular laws of definite proportions. In physics, the atomic theories led to the development of interpretation of numerous properties of solids, liquids and gases including the kinetic theory of gases and the atomic constitution of electricity (e.g. the work of [[J. J. Thomson]] in 1899) and [[H. A. Lorentz]]’s use of electrons in the theory of interaction of matter with [[electromagnetic radiation]]. | ||
Thomas Young's [[Double-slit experiment|double-slit experiment]] in 1803<ref>reported in his publication ''Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics''</ref> strongly indicated that light has wave characteristics. Then in 1924, Louis-Victor de Broglie (1892-1987) presented a hypothesis positing the wave characteristics of | Thomas Young's [[Double-slit experiment|double-slit experiment]] in 1803<ref>reported in his publication ''Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics''</ref> strongly indicated that light has wave characteristics. Then in 1924, [[Prince Louis-Victor de Broglie]] (1892-1987) presented a hypothesis positing the wave characteristics of particles with small rest mass, such as [[electron]]s, and suggested that a wavelength relationship applies to other particles with non-zero rest mass as well.<ref>In his doctoral thesis submitted in 1924 to the Faculty of Sciences at Paris University entitled ''Recherches sur la Théorie des Quanta'' (Researches on the quantum theory)</ref> DeBroglie's hypothesis, unequivocally supported by [[Davisson-Germer experiment|Davisson and Germer's research in 1927]] on the diffraction of electron beams by nickel crystals,<ref>Clinton J. Davisson & Lester H. Germer (1927) "Reflection of electrons by a crystal of nickel", Nature, V119, pp. 558-560 </ref><ref>[http://panda.unm.edu/Courses/Fields/Phys491/Notes/DavissonGermer.pdf Davisson-Germer Experiment] Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico. Retrieved April, 20th, 2008</ref> firmly established the wave-mechanics theory underlying current understanding of the wave nature of matter. In 1926, [[Erwin Schrödinger]]'s (1887-1961) [[Schrödinger equation|wave equation]] described the behaviour of electrons and other particles employing wave concepts. | ||
Work on the theoretical basis of the particle nature of radiation received support when the granular structure of light and other types of radiation was confirmed by the discovery of the '''photoelectric effect''':<ref>[http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/photoelectric_effect.html The Photoelectric Effect] Michael Fowler (1997) University of Virginia. The phenomenon was first observed by J. J. Thomson in 1899 and further demonstrated by Philipp | Work on the theoretical basis of the particle nature of radiation received support when the granular structure of light and other types of radiation was confirmed by the discovery of the '''photoelectric effect''':<ref>[http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/photoelectric_effect.html The Photoelectric Effect] Michael Fowler (1997) University of Virginia. The phenomenon was first observed by J. J. Thomson in 1899 and further demonstrated by Philipp Lenard in 1902, leading to [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s theory in 1905</ref> X-rays or light striking solid matter results in the emission of electrons from that matter, showing a direct relationship between the energy of the electrons and the frequency of the incident radiation (the radiation that strikes the solid matter).<ref> The relationship is independent of the intensity of the incident radiation</ref> The subsequent explanation of this phenomenon led to Albert Einstein's theory of light quanta proposed in 1905. In 1922, Arthur Compton observed and reported what is now called the [[Compton effect]], establishing the particle nature of light - photons.<ref>[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1929/broglie-lecture.pdf The wave nature of the electron] Louise de Broglie (1929) Nobel Lecture</ref><ref>[http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod1.html Wave-Particle Duality] [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/quantum/davger2.html Davisson-Germer Experiment] Rod Nave, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University</ref><ref>[http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/mod_tech/node154.html Wave-particle duality] University of Winnipeg</ref><ref>[http://zopyros.ccqc.uga.edu/lec_top/chem1211/lecture6/page1.html Wave Mechanics] Steven S. Wesolowski (1999). Center for Computational Chemistry, University of Georgia, USA</ref><ref>[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1937/davisson-lecture.pdf The discovery of electron waves] Clinton Davisson Nobel lecture, Dec. 13, 1937</ref><ref>[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1929/broglie-bio.html Louis de Broglie The Nobel Prize in Physics 1929] Nobel Prize Organization</ref><ref>[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1905/lenard-bio.html Philipp Lenard Biography] Nobel Foundation</ref> In 1927 [[Dirac]] [[Electromagnetic_wave#Quantization_of_the_electromagnetic_field|quantized the electromagnetic field]], thus putting photons (light quanta) on a firm theoretical foundation. | ||
< | ==Example== | ||
Wavelengths of various particles with non-zero rest mass according to <font style = "vertical-align: 15%"> <math>\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}</math></font>, where λ is the wavelength, ''h'' is [[Planck's constant]], ''m'' the rest mass, and ''v'' the speed of the particle. | |||
<div align = "center"> | |||
<table width = "70%"> | |||
<tr><td> '''Particle''' <td> '''Mass''' (g) <td> '''Speed''' (m/s) <td> '''Wavelength''' (m) </tr> | |||
<tr><td> 1 eV electron <td> 9.1× 10<sup>−28</sup> <td> 5.9× 10<sup>5</sup><td>12.0×10<sup>−10</sup> </tr> | |||
<tr><td> 100 eV electron <td> 9.1× 10<sup>−28</sup> <td> 5.9× 10<sup>6</sup><td>1.2×10<sup>−10</sup> </tr> | |||
<tr><td> 10,000 eV electron <td> 9.1× 10<sup>−28</sup> <td> 5.9× 10<sup>7</sup><td>0.12×10<sup>−10</sup> </tr> | |||
<tr><td> 100 eV proton <td>1.67× 10<sup>−24</sup> <td>1.38× 10<sup>5</sup><td>0.029×10<sup>−10</sup></tr> | |||
<tr><td> 100 eV α-particle <td> 6.6× 10<sup>−24</sup> <td> 6.9× 10<sup>4</sup><td>0.015×10<sup>−10</sup></tr> | |||
<tr><td> H<sub>2</sub> at 200 °C <td> 3.3× 10<sup>−24</sup> <td> 2.4× 10<sup>3</sup><td>0.82×10<sup>−10</sup> </tr> | |||
<tr><td> 22-rifle bullet <td> 1.9 <td> 320 <td>1.1×10<sup>−33</sup></tr> | |||
<tr><td> Golf ball <td> 45 <td> 30 <td>4.9×10<sup>−34</sup></tr> | |||
<tr><td> Baseball <td> 140 <td> 25 <td>1.9×10<sup>−34</sup></tr> | |||
</table> </div> | |||
From: ''W. J. Moore, Physical Chemistry, Longmans, London, 2nd edition (1956), p. 271'' | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 08:56, 28 November 2008
The wave-particle duality (or particle-wave duality) refers to the double nature of light and matter at the quantum level.
The debate arguably began in the 17th century with the competing theories of Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton. Huygen's observations led him to a wave theory of light while Newton's observations supported a corpuscular or particle theory. Newton's preeminence as the leading mind in related matters led to the dominance of his theory.
Eventually, subsequent research in the 19th and 20th centuries provided compelling support for both theories—light was found to behave as both a particle and a wave, a characteristic shared by the constituents of solid matter (electrons, atoms and molecules).
Wave theory was strongly supported and continued in optics for more than 100 years. However, in chemistry the atomic structure of matter provided insight into molecular laws of definite proportions. In physics, the atomic theories led to the development of interpretation of numerous properties of solids, liquids and gases including the kinetic theory of gases and the atomic constitution of electricity (e.g. the work of J. J. Thomson in 1899) and H. A. Lorentz’s use of electrons in the theory of interaction of matter with electromagnetic radiation.
Thomas Young's double-slit experiment in 1803[1] strongly indicated that light has wave characteristics. Then in 1924, Prince Louis-Victor de Broglie (1892-1987) presented a hypothesis positing the wave characteristics of particles with small rest mass, such as electrons, and suggested that a wavelength relationship applies to other particles with non-zero rest mass as well.[2] DeBroglie's hypothesis, unequivocally supported by Davisson and Germer's research in 1927 on the diffraction of electron beams by nickel crystals,[3][4] firmly established the wave-mechanics theory underlying current understanding of the wave nature of matter. In 1926, Erwin Schrödinger's (1887-1961) wave equation described the behaviour of electrons and other particles employing wave concepts.
Work on the theoretical basis of the particle nature of radiation received support when the granular structure of light and other types of radiation was confirmed by the discovery of the photoelectric effect:[5] X-rays or light striking solid matter results in the emission of electrons from that matter, showing a direct relationship between the energy of the electrons and the frequency of the incident radiation (the radiation that strikes the solid matter).[6] The subsequent explanation of this phenomenon led to Albert Einstein's theory of light quanta proposed in 1905. In 1922, Arthur Compton observed and reported what is now called the Compton effect, establishing the particle nature of light - photons.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In 1927 Dirac quantized the electromagnetic field, thus putting photons (light quanta) on a firm theoretical foundation.
Example
Wavelengths of various particles with non-zero rest mass according to , where λ is the wavelength, h is Planck's constant, m the rest mass, and v the speed of the particle.
| Particle | Mass (g) | Speed (m/s) | Wavelength (m) |
| 1 eV electron | 9.1× 10−28 | 5.9× 105 | 12.0×10−10 |
| 100 eV electron | 9.1× 10−28 | 5.9× 106 | 1.2×10−10 |
| 10,000 eV electron | 9.1× 10−28 | 5.9× 107 | 0.12×10−10 |
| 100 eV proton | 1.67× 10−24 | 1.38× 105 | 0.029×10−10 |
| 100 eV α-particle | 6.6× 10−24 | 6.9× 104 | 0.015×10−10 |
| H2 at 200 °C | 3.3× 10−24 | 2.4× 103 | 0.82×10−10 |
| 22-rifle bullet | 1.9 | 320 | 1.1×10−33 |
| Golf ball | 45 | 30 | 4.9×10−34 |
| Baseball | 140 | 25 | 1.9×10−34 |
From: W. J. Moore, Physical Chemistry, Longmans, London, 2nd edition (1956), p. 271
References
- ↑ reported in his publication Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics
- ↑ In his doctoral thesis submitted in 1924 to the Faculty of Sciences at Paris University entitled Recherches sur la Théorie des Quanta (Researches on the quantum theory)
- ↑ Clinton J. Davisson & Lester H. Germer (1927) "Reflection of electrons by a crystal of nickel", Nature, V119, pp. 558-560
- ↑ Davisson-Germer Experiment Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico. Retrieved April, 20th, 2008
- ↑ The Photoelectric Effect Michael Fowler (1997) University of Virginia. The phenomenon was first observed by J. J. Thomson in 1899 and further demonstrated by Philipp Lenard in 1902, leading to Einstein's theory in 1905
- ↑ The relationship is independent of the intensity of the incident radiation
- ↑ The wave nature of the electron Louise de Broglie (1929) Nobel Lecture
- ↑ Wave-Particle Duality Davisson-Germer Experiment Rod Nave, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University
- ↑ Wave-particle duality University of Winnipeg
- ↑ Wave Mechanics Steven S. Wesolowski (1999). Center for Computational Chemistry, University of Georgia, USA
- ↑ The discovery of electron waves Clinton Davisson Nobel lecture, Dec. 13, 1937
- ↑ Louis de Broglie The Nobel Prize in Physics 1929 Nobel Prize Organization
- ↑ Philipp Lenard Biography Nobel Foundation