User talk:George Swan/Sandbox/Heather Cerveny: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
m (Talk:Heather Cerveny moved to User talk:George Swan/Sandbox/Heather Cerveny: Editorial decision that article is out of date and unmaintainable)
imported>George Swan
 
Line 8: Line 8:


The article clearly needed maintenance and has not been maintained. Since it is about a presumably living individual, I recommend deletion. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
The article clearly needed maintenance and has not been maintained. Since it is about a presumably living individual, I recommend deletion. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
== Could you please explain... ==
[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User%3AGeorge_Swan%2FSandbox%2FHeather_Cerveny&diff=100467527&oldid=100381098 This edit] removes
the passages:
:''"Previous inquiries, like the [[Schmidt report]], concluded that abuse at the camps was degrading but did not rise to the level of "inhumane".<ref name=Def050713>[http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2005/20050713_2053.html Alleged Guantanamo Abuse Did Not Rise to Level of 'Inhumane'], ''[[Department of Defense]]'', [[July 13]] [[2005]]</ref>"''
:''"While his report has not been made public, and Colonel Basset has made no public comment about it, various military spokesmen have commented on it, repeating the claim that an al Qaeda training manual counseled al Qaeda operatives to lie about being abused, and insisting that abuse of captives was against policy."
A version of Bassett's report has been made public now.  I think updating the article requires restoration of these excised passages.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 12:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:58, 22 April 2011

The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.

Fountain pen.png
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of this version.
George Swan 04:19, 27 February 2008 (CST)

Recommend deletion

This speaks of things that were to have happened in late 2006; there are no resolutions of any of the charges. Given the amount of information that has been made available, is one paralegal's affidavit really significant?

The article clearly needed maintenance and has not been maintained. Since it is about a presumably living individual, I recommend deletion. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain...

This edit removes the passages:

"Previous inquiries, like the Schmidt report, concluded that abuse at the camps was degrading but did not rise to the level of "inhumane".[1]"
"While his report has not been made public, and Colonel Basset has made no public comment about it, various military spokesmen have commented on it, repeating the claim that an al Qaeda training manual counseled al Qaeda operatives to lie about being abused, and insisting that abuse of captives was against policy."

A version of Bassett's report has been made public now. I think updating the article requires restoration of these excised passages. George Swan 12:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)