Talk:C Sharp: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
No edit summary
imported>Pat Palmer
(checklist updates)
Line 4: Line 4:
|                cat2 =  
|                cat2 =  
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = yes
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = yes
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = no
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 06:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 06:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT),[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 22:13, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}



Revision as of 21:13, 21 September 2007


Article Checklist for "C Sharp"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Mark Jones 06:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT),Pat Palmer 22:13, 21 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Some important questions/issues regarding this stub

The article stub is currently written about the 'C#' programming language, but the article title is 'C' (perhaps because the # does not work in the article title and got stripped?); C# is actually a completely different (but derivative) programming language to C.

This leads on to a few important questions:

  1. This article entry should probably actually relate to the letter 'C' as most ordinary readers would relate it to the letter rather than the programming language. (See [1] for example.)
  2. Should this article be about C only, or C and all its derivative languages (i.e. C++, C#)? Wikipedia handles each within its own article (see [2], [3] and [4]). I proffer the current Wikipedia approach is the best approach.
  3. I also suggest the 'C' programming language article needs a disambiguation (like the Wikipedia page referenced above) to distinguish it from the letter C.


Please offer your opinions. If I hear nothing within a few days I will start making the changes I outlined above (including making this article a stub about the alphabetical letter 'C' and starting a new C Sharp stub). Thanks.

Mark Jones 06:52, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

I have moved it to C Sharp from C. I can't see any other way of doing this at the moment. John Stephenson 23:00, 6 August 2007 (CDT)
Actually I have just twigged another issue; now it sounds like it's a music article... John Stephenson 23:08, 6 August 2007 (CDT)
Heh, I never saw that one coming. I think it would be okay, though, to let the musical note C be covered in a general article—maybe musical notation or musical scale. I am not sure there is really much to write about one note :-). Ah, I just checked and Wikipedia has articles for both of those also; I think it would work well to follow that approach for the musical notes 'C' and 'C#'. Mark Jones 08:43, 7 August 2007 (CDT)

removed sentence archived here

Similar in syntactical style to both java and C, it is easy to learn whilst offering much of the power of c++.

C# is much more like Java that it is like C++. I intend to add some info in the near future about C#, including that it uses the familiar syntax of the C family of languages.Pat Palmer 00:53, 24 August 2007 (CDT)