Talk:Elizabeth II: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards (question about political powers) |
imported>John Stephenson (Powers of the monarch) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Can we find someone who knows about constitutional issues to rephrase these things? Some Editors, maybe?--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 22:10, 23 July 2007 (CDT) | Can we find someone who knows about constitutional issues to rephrase these things? Some Editors, maybe?--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 22:10, 23 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I will check this, but my understanding is she has no power - she appoints people on the advice of the prime minister or other figure, i.e. effectively these posts are filled by the governments. It is true that no law says she has to pick the biggest party to form a government - because the UK constitution works by precedent and convention - but she arguably has no authority to do so since the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary sovereignty in the 17th century. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 23:00, 24 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 22:00, 24 July 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Politics Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | John Stephenson 04:49, 11 July 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
The statement "In none of these offices does she hold any formal political power." is not quite correct. At least in the UK, but also in Australia, there are some vestigial formal powers. As far as I recollect, the monarch in the UK invites a leader of a political party to form a governent, but she is not required to choose the party with the most seats. This discretion has yet to be misused, but remains as a formal power. In the case of Australia, unless it has changed without my noticing, the monarch appoints a Governor-General as her representative: presumably, s/he has a few roles to play and therefore has some limited powers.
Can we find someone who knows about constitutional issues to rephrase these things? Some Editors, maybe?--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 22:10, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- I will check this, but my understanding is she has no power - she appoints people on the advice of the prime minister or other figure, i.e. effectively these posts are filled by the governments. It is true that no law says she has to pick the biggest party to form a government - because the UK constitution works by precedent and convention - but she arguably has no authority to do so since the establishment of a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary sovereignty in the 17th century. John Stephenson 23:00, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
- Politics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Topic Informant Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Advanced Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Topic Informant Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Topic Informant Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- Topic Informant Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- Topic Informant External Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Topic Informant Underlinked Articles
- Politics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Topic Informant Cleanup
- Cleanup