Talk:Elizabeth II: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(Article checklist)
 
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
(question about political powers)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:49, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:49, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
The statement "In none of these offices does she hold any  formal political power." is not quite correct. At least in the UK, but also in Australia, there are some vestigial formal powers. As far as I recollect, the monarch in the UK invites a leader of a political party to form a governent, but she is not required to choose the party with the most seats. This discretion has yet to be misused, but remains as a formal power. In the case of Australia, unless it has changed without my noticing, the monarch appoints a Governor-General as her representative: presumably, s/he has a few roles to play and therefore has some limited powers.
Can we find someone who knows about constitutional issues to rephrase these things? Some Editors, maybe?--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 22:10, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:10, 23 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Elizabeth II"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 04:49, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





The statement "In none of these offices does she hold any formal political power." is not quite correct. At least in the UK, but also in Australia, there are some vestigial formal powers. As far as I recollect, the monarch in the UK invites a leader of a political party to form a governent, but she is not required to choose the party with the most seats. This discretion has yet to be misused, but remains as a formal power. In the case of Australia, unless it has changed without my noticing, the monarch appoints a Governor-General as her representative: presumably, s/he has a few roles to play and therefore has some limited powers.

Can we find someone who knows about constitutional issues to rephrase these things? Some Editors, maybe?--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 22:10, 23 July 2007 (CDT)