CZ Talk:Subpages: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day (→Page headers: remove junk) |
imported>Chris Day |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
Can't we just include the page header in the subpages template so it is automated? This will ensure the correct headers are used in all cases. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 09:34, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | Can't we just include the page header in the subpages template so it is automated? This will ensure the correct headers are used in all cases. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 09:34, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I just added some code to the top of the subpages template that allows the correct header template to be identifed and placed automatically. Note now that each subpage in biology has two headers. One from the subpages template and one that was placed manually. This should save time and be less confusing for people who are creating new subpages (i.e. only one tempate to worry about.) [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 10:52, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | :I just added some code to the top of the subpages template that allows the correct header template to be identifed and placed automatically. Note now that each subpage in biology has two headers. One from the subpages template and one that was placed manually. This should save time and be less confusing for people who are creating new subpages (i.e. only one tempate to worry about.) [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 10:52, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
==categories or not?== | |||
While we are discussing headers should they be adding different categories for the various subpages. An example can be seen for the gallery header. Compare the categories for the [[Life/Gallery]] (a hypothetically approved gallery) and the unapproved [[Anthropology/Gallery]]. These categories are selected based on the fields being designated in the template placed at the head of the gallery page. For example, for Life the template is <nowiki>{{Gallery header|group=biology|approved=yes}}</nowiki> for anthropology it is <nowiki>{{Gallery header|group=anthropology}}</nowiki>. If we have the auto generated headers (see [[#Page headers|discussion above]]) as part of the subpages template then it would be as follows: <nowiki>{{subpages|group=biology|approved=yes}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{subpages|group=anthropology}}</nowiki> [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 11:01, 19 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:01, 19 July 2007
Invited, Signed Articles
I presume invitations can go to CZ non-members, Albert Gore, say. --Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 17:55, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
Right. --Larry Sanger 10:16, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
For students
Could we provide another version of the main article targeting Middle--to--High-School, or even younger depending on article? --Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 17:58, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
Yes, we could. Good idea; it's technically feasible to start up both "expert" and "middle-school" level articles. --Larry Sanger 10:16, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
Earlier nominations
Nominated articles
Anybody can nominate an article here
Yea
Nay
Yea
Nay
Yea
nay
- Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) (needs work}
Yea
Nay
Yea
Nay
Discussion
Purpose?
I can't see how, aside from perhaps the debate and news guides and invited articles this whole subpage thing will be helpful. Is there an essential difference from including the bibliography in the article, aside from fragmenting the information? I don't particularly relish the thought of moving back and forth between subpages to read referenced material or see pictures. I'd rather just scroll through a well-organized collection of information. James A. Flippin 01:28, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- As I understand it, the references section in articles will stay; the bibliography subpage will be different, a collection of great sources for further reading on the subject. If I am mistaken, if it removes all references to a subpage, I very much agree with you. It would be needless and very frustrating fragmentation, akin to the frustration of reading a book with all its references in the back rather than at the bottom of the page...constantly, constantly, constantly having to flip between the text and the references cited.
- Regarding the Gallery, I understand the same principle will operate. The gallery will be additional photos not contained in the text, a "pictorial article" of sorts, ideally. For an example, see Onslow Beach and click on the gallery link.
- One issue going on right now you mgith wish to weigh in on is the placement location of the subpage links/box. See http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1059.0.html if you wish to see various examples and give your opinion on the matter.
- —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 02:48, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- I believe the bibliography and weblinks in the subpages are meant to be annotated as well. For long lists of sources, this would make for very long articles if they were left in the main article space. --Joe Quick (Talk) 03:02, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
Page headers
Can't we just include the page header in the subpages template so it is automated? This will ensure the correct headers are used in all cases. Chris Day (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
- I just added some code to the top of the subpages template that allows the correct header template to be identifed and placed automatically. Note now that each subpage in biology has two headers. One from the subpages template and one that was placed manually. This should save time and be less confusing for people who are creating new subpages (i.e. only one tempate to worry about.) Chris Day (talk) 10:52, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
categories or not?
While we are discussing headers should they be adding different categories for the various subpages. An example can be seen for the gallery header. Compare the categories for the Life/Gallery (a hypothetically approved gallery) and the unapproved Anthropology/Gallery. These categories are selected based on the fields being designated in the template placed at the head of the gallery page. For example, for Life the template is {{Gallery header|group=biology|approved=yes}} for anthropology it is {{Gallery header|group=anthropology}}. If we have the auto generated headers (see discussion above) as part of the subpages template then it would be as follows: {{subpages|group=biology|approved=yes}} or {{subpages|group=anthropology}} Chris Day (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2007 (CDT)