Talk:Young earth creationism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yi Zhe Wu (→one question: explanation) |
imported>Robert Tito m (→one question) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
can somebody explain to me the role of biology in young earth creationism? That seems quite inappropriate to put biology in creationism. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:grey"> <font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 21:24, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | can somebody explain to me the role of biology in young earth creationism? That seems quite inappropriate to put biology in creationism. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:grey"> <font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 21:24, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Because the young earth creationism does address some issues about origin of organisms, which is within the purview of biology. But I'm not sure. If the biology workgroup guys have the consensus to remove the workgroup designation, they are free to do so. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 21:30, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | :Because the young earth creationism does address some issues about origin of organisms, which is within the purview of biology. But I'm not sure. If the biology workgroup guys have the consensus to remove the workgroup designation, they are free to do so. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 21:30, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::never mind [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:grey"> <font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 21:40, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:40, 25 May 2007
Unless the author quickly replaces this initial text with a scholarly introduction - or puts a bibliography here on the discusion page I believe this article should be speedily deleted. Citizendium is a compendium of knowlege and starting a new article requires a committment to scholarship, especially when it is a controversial topic. Nancy Sculerati 17:13, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- I've expanded it, and the article needs editors' help. Thanks! PLEASE do not turn this article into a diatribe against young earth creationism. It should be neutral. Yi Zhe Wu 21:09, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
if true THEN 7 days
literally true means 7 days. Robert Tito | Talk
- The article needs to be neutral, please do not turn it into a diatribe. Yi Zhe Wu 21:09, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- literally seems to be what it says, literally.
By the way, one cannot invent physical properties, only apply them. Robert Tito | Talk 21:11, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
one question
can somebody explain to me the role of biology in young earth creationism? That seems quite inappropriate to put biology in creationism. Robert Tito | Talk 21:24, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Because the young earth creationism does address some issues about origin of organisms, which is within the purview of biology. But I'm not sure. If the biology workgroup guys have the consensus to remove the workgroup designation, they are free to do so. Yi Zhe Wu 21:30, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- never mind Robert Tito | Talk 21:40, 25 May 2007 (CDT)