Talk:Moore's law: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
("Other considerations" a bit vague; can we get a better header title?)
imported>Pat Palmer
m (Talk:Moore's Law moved to Talk:Moore's law: No reason I can think of why "law" needs to be capitalized.)

Revision as of 00:36, 9 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Moore's law"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 12:28, 22 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Absorb or remove "External Links" and "FAQ" and "Data" sections?

If these are really important to the subject, perhaps they can be used as references. If not, why add them here? Can't people just Google to find the latest links? "External Links" will not usually be maintained by anyone here as they change over time. To illustrate, take a look at the article's table of contents. The entire bottom 1/3 of it is references, notes, external links, faqs, etc. In other words, not topics within the article. To me, that seems to distract from the real topic headers.Pat Palmer 01:31, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

"Other considerations" a bit vague

What's the section really about? Can someone try to choose an explicit header title?Pat Palmer 01:33, 9 May 2007 (CDT)