User talk:Robert W King: Difference between revisions
imported>K kay shearin (I welcome your help) |
imported>Chris Day |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
You are welcome to manipulate those images any way you want, as long as I can still view them, so I can modify their content if I want to. Because I only wrote the article, and created the figures, because Larry Sanger suggested it (at [[Talk:Innocence Project]]), I feel responsible for the content of the article, and the format is immaterial to me as long as it doesn't keep me from getting to the content. -- [[User:K kay shearin|k. kay]] 17:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | You are welcome to manipulate those images any way you want, as long as I can still view them, so I can modify their content if I want to. Because I only wrote the article, and created the figures, because Larry Sanger suggested it (at [[Talk:Innocence Project]]), I feel responsible for the content of the article, and the format is immaterial to me as long as it doesn't keep me from getting to the content. -- [[User:K kay shearin|k. kay]] 17:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
==electron orbitals== | |||
Robert how are these supposed to be written into the chem info box. i just did a partial fix in the Polonium article to stop the info box width being forced wide. While the width seems correct I don't think the resulting notation is correct. Can you take a look at it and do it correctly. Thanks. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 20:21, 23 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:21, 23 September 2007
[User bio is in User:Your Name]
Speedydeletes
This one, too? [1] --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:43, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yep.
- K
Image display problem you raised
I'm the one who uploaded the Guilt in U.S. law images you complained of on its talk page. (I'm also the one who created them and will modify their content if/when I decide to.) CZ's computer won't let me upload JPGs, so I can't convert them -- by e-mail on 5/30/07 Constable Zach Pruckowski told me other users had the same problem and to upload PNGs instead of JPGs. After I put them up the first time, they were too wide, and I asked for someone to scale them properly, and User John Stephenson did, but then they were black rectangles I couldn't view. There's a discussion of it, dated 8/2/07, on his talk page (harking back to a discussion of black rectangles on the Talk:Main Page that you may access thru 7/23&24/07 entries on my talk page). I was away for about six weeks, and when I got back no one had fixed the problem, so I did it myself, by reverting from black boxes to the figures and then reducing their size so their full width fits on my monitor screen.
You are welcome to manipulate those images any way you want, as long as I can still view them, so I can modify their content if I want to. Because I only wrote the article, and created the figures, because Larry Sanger suggested it (at Talk:Innocence Project), I feel responsible for the content of the article, and the format is immaterial to me as long as it doesn't keep me from getting to the content. -- k. kay 17:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
electron orbitals
Robert how are these supposed to be written into the chem info box. i just did a partial fix in the Polonium article to stop the info box width being forced wide. While the width seems correct I don't think the resulting notation is correct. Can you take a look at it and do it correctly. Thanks. Chris Day (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2007 (CDT)