User talk:Robert W King

Robert W King

Current talk page

Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4

[User bio is in User:Your Name]

Speedydeletes

This one, too? [1] --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:43, 16 September 2007 (CDT)

Yep.

K

Image display problem you raised

I'm the one who uploaded the Guilt in U.S. law images you complained of on its talk page. (I'm also the one who created them and will modify their content if/when I decide to.) CZ's computer won't let me upload JPGs, so I can't convert them -- by e-mail on 5/30/07 Constable Zach Pruckowski told me other users had the same problem and to upload PNGs instead of JPGs. After I put them up the first time, they were too wide, and I asked for someone to scale them properly, and User John Stephenson did, but then they were black rectangles I couldn't view. There's a discussion of it, dated 8/2/07, on his talk page (harking back to a discussion of black rectangles on the Talk:Main Page that you may access thru 7/23&24/07 entries on my talk page). I was away for about six weeks, and when I got back no one had fixed the problem, so I did it myself, by reverting from black boxes to the figures and then reducing their size so their full width fits on my monitor screen.

You are welcome to manipulate those images any way you want, as long as I can still view them, so I can modify their content if I want to. Because I only wrote the article, and created the figures, because Larry Sanger suggested it (at Talk:Innocence Project), I feel responsible for the content of the article, and the format is immaterial to me as long as it doesn't keep me from getting to the content. -- k. kay 17:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT)

electron orbitals

Robert how are these supposed to be written into the chem info box. i just did a partial fix in the Polonium article to stop the info box width being forced wide. While the width seems correct I don't think the resulting notation is correct. Can you take a look at it and do it correctly. Thanks. Chris Day (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

The article I need is....

Ain't Jus' Any Ole Dawgs by Dr. Sally Reed. Bloodlines Magazine Jan./Feb 1992.

I have attempted to e-mail the United Kennel Club (publisher) Kentucky, I think, to no avail.

To the best of my knowledge, Bloodlines Magazine is not available in Australia. It's only available in a few libraries in the US, but maybe one near you?

I'd love to read this, if this can be arranged. Aleta Curry 21:30, 26 September 2007 (CDT)

All's good

Thanks, Matt Innis (Talk) 21:35, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

Do you have an email address in "my preferences" above? --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:39, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

Yes. --Robert W King 21:40, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

Says verified on 6 April 2007.

When I try to email you, it says no valid email on file... does yours have a hyphen in it? Or anything that might make it invalid? --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:44, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

It has two "."s to seperate first middle and last...

That might be it, but I also see that it says "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." Check to see if you have "Enable other users to email me" checked at the bottom of the page. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:47, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

I just enabled it.

Now All's Gooood! --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:59, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

Hehe, back at ya, Eye-gor!--Matt Innis (Talk) 22:05, 29 September 2007 (CDT)

Japanese article

Hehe yepp. I'm not that into CZ though :-) and of course I rarely use school computer to access it. Yi Zhe Wu 21:09, 9 October 2007 (CDT)

That poor lil dog that's always accused of biting people

Saw your note. Can you reply at Talk:Rottweiler#High priority? Thanks! Aleta Curry 17:28, 11 October 2007 (CDT)

Thanks

Robert, thanks for your observation on the Bailey article. I've followed your implicit suggestion and radically reduced the number of quotations and made the whole article much tighter. James Davis 10:55, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

Plural

Hello, Robert. Since you ask...!...I reckon you made a valiant attempt to improve on a sloppy draft which had already doomed itself. And also that this is a case where Wikipedia is impressive. What do you say to starting from there? Robert Thorpe 16:29, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

I prefer not to start from wikipedia; I avoid it at all cost. In my opinion it is a greater credit to ourselves if we begin an article anew, even if it's not as thorough (from the start). I find more satisfaction in it. --Robert W King 16:33, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

That's the style. I think I'll let you develop it for a bit, then... Robert Thorpe 16:51, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

Don't worry, I do understand you. I've started a few articles here without looking at WP, so believe me I buy into the ethos. But, faced with the daunting task of developing this article, inertia overwhelms: there are more enjoyable things to do here. I'm too old to be writing assignments. That said, I'll be delighted to help with specifics at any stage. Robert Thorpe 09:40, 13 October 2007 (CDT)

I totally appreciate your stance ;). I suppose one man's coffee is another man's tea, chai, vinegar... I'm inventing a new "old saying". I am sure you see where this is going. --Robert W King 09:56, 13 October 2007 (CDT)

That's fine - Robert Thorpe 14:10, 13 October 2007 (CDT)

Enjoy

... your weekend! I'm not sure what you do for stress relief, but I like camping.. it's just getting cool enough for a nice hike ;-) Matt Innis (Talk) 23:02, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

I've been waiting for a good opportunity to test out some TF2. --Robert W King 23:28, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

TF2, the game? That would stress me out!!! But then that just shows my age :-) Matt Innis (Talk) 23:43, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

I need a template designed

Robert, I would like to have a template made for viruses. They something like that on WP. It would include things like Family: Genus: Sero-Complex: and Species: or something like that, in a box on the right hand side of the page. CZ also has something like this for chemical elements. Do you have the know-how to make something like this for me? So far, we have West Nile virus and Dengue fever pages that could use this. I would like to make a template for viruses before doing much more work on this catagory.

Thanks, David E. Volk 14:55, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Virus taxonomy box, trying it alone first

Just got your message. I am trying to make one myself by doing a little reading and cluging off of the chem infobox. I'll write back for suggestions later. Thanks, David E. Volk 17:10, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

¡Me llamo José Rapido!

Actually, the name comes from my Dutch ancestors. My great great grandfather was named Wilhelmus Kvik when he got off the boat in New York but the immigration officials at Ellis Island decided that he would be named William Quick now that he was in the U.S. Joe Quick 22:22, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

chem infobox -radio isotopes?

Have you considered a spot to list radio-active isotopes?

I would put it underneath the hazards, and call it radio-isotopes. Then we could input the isotopes using superscripts like

³H for titritium, as an example, on the proton(hydrogen) element page.

Do you want anything else, as far as context goes? Electron config, anything? --Robert W King 12:59, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

Actually, lets make two catagories, "stable-isotopes" for all elements, and "radio-isotopes" for those elements that have them. We might use a flag like radio=yes/no; then display the radio-isotope heading and include radio-isotopes=³H

We might also put in gyromagnetic ratios and other nuclear parameters. David E. Volk 13:04, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

I'll get on it today. I appreciate your input greatly as it's (unfortunately) the only input I've had on the chem infobox to the date! --Robert W King 13:08, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

Disregard previous moronic statement regarding deuterium and tritium not being NMR active! had brain freeze for a moment.

this site (http://www.acornnmr.com/periodic%20table.htm) shows a periodic table with the NMR active nuclei, i.e. those with nuclear spin. Note that ¹⁸O has a nuclear spin of -5/2, for example. Practically speaking, it means it sucks for nuclear magnetic resonance. In generally, if both the number of protons and the number of neutrons are equal numbers, then nuclear spin=0. Sensitivity (proportional to gyromagnetic ratio) is maybe too much for your box. Let's stick with nuclear spin? David E. Volk 13:36, 18 October 2007 (CDT)

Honestly, whatever you think would be worthy of being inclusive but doesn't end up "messy" or "overloaded". --Robert W King 13:41, 18 October 2007 (CDT)