Riemann-Roch theorem: Difference between revisions
imported>David Lehavi (wrote about generalizations. sketched proofs and references) |
imported>David Lehavi (wrote about different proofs) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
good descriptions of the geometry of the linear system. | good descriptions of the geometry of the linear system. | ||
Another direction of generalization, with more far-reaching consequences, is to view | Another direction of generalization, with more far-reaching consequences, is to view Riemann roch as a tool to compute the Euler characteristic of a vector bundle on a Variety. The first generalizations in this direction go back to the beginning of the 20th century with [[Riemann-Roch for surfaces]] and [[Noether's formula]] on surfaces. The next step, taken during the 1960s, is the [[Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch theorem]], which analyze the Euler characteristic of the canonical bundle of an arbitrary. The final step in the algebro-geometric setting is the [[Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem]], which analyzes the behaviour of the Euler characteristic of vector bundles under pullbacks; e.g. the Riemann-Roch theorem can be deduced from the Grothendieck-Riemann Roch theorem by projecting a curve to a point. | ||
In the analytic setting Grothendieck Riemann Roch had one more generalization: the [[Atiya-Singer index theorem]]. | In the analytic setting Grothendieck Riemann Roch had one more generalization: the [[Atiya-Singer index theorem]]. | ||
=== Proofs === | === Proofs === | ||
* The sheaf theoretic proof: Using modern tools, the theorem is an immediate consequence of [[Serre's duality]]. | * The sheaf theoretic proof: Using modern tools, the theorem is an immediate consequence of [[Serre's duality]], and the fact that if <math>D,D'</math> are divisors on <math>C</math> then <math>\chi(O_C(D+D'))=\chi(O_C(D))+\chi(O_C(D'))</math>. | ||
* The analytic proof (see Griffiths and Harris) | * The analytic proof was chronologically the first one given - one analyzes the relation between meromorphic functions on <math>C</math> with prescribed poles, and holomorphic differentials on <math>C</math> with prescribed zeros over the same points (see Griffiths and Harris). | ||
* | * The Italian proof follows from immersing the curve in the projective plane, and from explicit work with the [[adjunction formula]] (see ACGH) | ||
* | * Weil's algebraic proof over function fields. (see Rosen) | ||
=== References === | === References === |
Revision as of 21:20, 10 March 2007
In algebraic geometry the Riemann-Roch theorem states that if is a smooth algebraic curve, and is an invertible sheaf on then the the following properties hold:
- The Euler characteristic of is given by
- There is a canonical isomorphism
Some examples and applications
The examples we give arise from considering complete linear systems on curves.
- Any curve of genus 0 is isomorphic to the projective line: Indeed if p is a point on the curve then ; hence the map is a degree 1 map, or an isomorphism.
- Any curve of genus 1 is a double cover of a projective line: Indeed if p is a point on the curve then ; hence the map is a degree 2 map.
- Any curve of genus 2 is a double cover of a projective line: Indeed the degree of the canonical class is and therefore ; since the map is a degree 2 map.
- The Riemann-Hurwitz formula.
Geometric Riemann-Roch
From the statement of the theorem one sees that an effective divisor of degree on a curve satisfies if and only if there is an effective divisor such that in . In this case there is a natural isomorphism
, where we identify with it's image in the dual canonical system .
As an example we consider effective divisors of degrees on a non hyperelliptic curve of genus 3. The degree of the canonical class is , whereas . Hence the canonical image of is a smooth plane quartic. We now idenitfy with it's image in the dual canonical system. Let be two points on then there are exactly two points such that , where we intersect with multiplicities, and if we consider the tangent line instead of the line . Hence there is a natural isomorphism between and the unique point in representing the line . There is also a natural ismorphism between and the points in representing lines through the points .
Generalizations
The generalizations of th Riemann-Roch theorem come in two flavors: One direction views Riemann Roch theorem as a tool to study any linear system on a any curve. Clifford's theorem gives a better bound on the dimension of special linear systems on curve. If the assumption on the curve is relaxed to be a generic curve, then the Brill-Noether Theorem and the Petri Theorem give good descriptions of the geometry of the linear system.
Another direction of generalization, with more far-reaching consequences, is to view Riemann roch as a tool to compute the Euler characteristic of a vector bundle on a Variety. The first generalizations in this direction go back to the beginning of the 20th century with Riemann-Roch for surfaces and Noether's formula on surfaces. The next step, taken during the 1960s, is the Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch theorem, which analyze the Euler characteristic of the canonical bundle of an arbitrary. The final step in the algebro-geometric setting is the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem, which analyzes the behaviour of the Euler characteristic of vector bundles under pullbacks; e.g. the Riemann-Roch theorem can be deduced from the Grothendieck-Riemann Roch theorem by projecting a curve to a point. In the analytic setting Grothendieck Riemann Roch had one more generalization: the Atiya-Singer index theorem.
Proofs
- The sheaf theoretic proof: Using modern tools, the theorem is an immediate consequence of Serre's duality, and the fact that if are divisors on then .
- The analytic proof was chronologically the first one given - one analyzes the relation between meromorphic functions on with prescribed poles, and holomorphic differentials on with prescribed zeros over the same points (see Griffiths and Harris).
- The Italian proof follows from immersing the curve in the projective plane, and from explicit work with the adjunction formula (see ACGH)
- Weil's algebraic proof over function fields. (see Rosen)
References
- E. Arabarello M. Cornalba P. Griffiths and J. Harris
- P. Grifiths and J. Harris Principles of Algebraic geometry Chapter 2.3
- M. Rosen Number theory in Function Fields Chapter 6
- W. Fulton Intersection Theory