Talk:Ring (mathematics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Simen Rustad No edit summary |
imported>Simen Rustad mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*History of the subject should be included. | *History of the subject should be included. | ||
[[User:Simen Rustad|Simen Rustad]] 02:09, 2 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 02:09, 2 November 2006
Notes
Started editing the first two sections of the article. I'm afraid it doesn't easily lead itself to being turned into prose.
Some points:
- I removed the existence of an identity element from the axioms.
- I cut down on the number of examples, rather focusing on the basic examples. If you are looking for examples of rings, I guess knowing that the set polynomials are rings is good enough, and knowing that the set of polynomials with coefficients in a ring i a ring only creates confusion. Same fact with matrices and functions.
- Some reference should be made to ideals, with a link to ideal (ring theory)
- In my opinion, the "Basic theorems" should go; at least in the current form
- "Constructing new Rings..." needs cleanup.
- History of the subject should be included.
Simen Rustad 02:09, 2 November 2006 (CST)