Talk:Mount Blue Sky: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→a suggestion on ordering: my ideas on renaming section) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== a suggestion on ordering == | == a suggestion on ordering == | ||
Very nice work on this article. What would you think about moving the "renaming" section up, maybe right under the intro? Or not. This was a topic I knew nothing about and I'm enjoying reading about it! [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 10:53, 20 March 2023 (CDT) | Very nice work on this article. What would you think about moving the "renaming" section up, maybe right under the intro? Or not. This was a topic I knew nothing about and I'm enjoying reading about it! [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 10:53, 20 March 2023 (CDT) | ||
:: thanks Pat. it's a rather fascinating mountain. I've driven a car up it before, and it's wild! I think right now I'd prefer to leave the renaming section at the end, but it is mentioned in a summary way in the article introduction. I don't want to make the article, in regards to the name controversy, give it any more weight than it already has.[[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 22:13, 20 March 2023 (CDT) |
Revision as of 22:14, 20 March 2023
a suggestion on ordering
Very nice work on this article. What would you think about moving the "renaming" section up, maybe right under the intro? Or not. This was a topic I knew nothing about and I'm enjoying reading about it! Pat Palmer (talk) 10:53, 20 March 2023 (CDT)
- thanks Pat. it's a rather fascinating mountain. I've driven a car up it before, and it's wild! I think right now I'd prefer to leave the renaming section at the end, but it is mentioned in a summary way in the article introduction. I don't want to make the article, in regards to the name controversy, give it any more weight than it already has.Jack S. Byrom (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2023 (CDT)