User:Anthony.Sebastian/Sbox01: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The atoms that comprise the [[chemical elements]] of the [[periodic table]], while consisting in part of the electrically charged particles, protons and electrons, do not themselves manifest an electric charge, because protons in the nuclei and the surrounding electrons are equal in number and quantity of charge, that balance ensuring that the atoms as a whole manifest no ''net'' electric charge—a state referred to as electrical neutrality. | The atoms that comprise the [[chemical elements]] of the [[periodic table]], while consisting in part of the electrically charged particles, protons and electrons, do not themselves manifest an electric charge, because protons in the nuclei and the surrounding electrons are equal in number and quantity of charge, that balance ensuring that the atoms as a whole manifest no ''net'' electric charge—a state referred to as electrical neutrality. | ||
==Discovery and naming of electric charge== | |||
The ancient Greeks as far back of [[Thales|Thales of Miletus]] had observed some of the simple phenomenology related to electric charge, speculating on mechanism, little coming of it, including terminology.<ref name-houston1905/> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist3 test|refs= | {{reflist3 test|refs= | ||
<!-- <ref name=franklin1747>Franklin B. (1747) Letter: To Peter Collinson, Philadelphia, July 11, 1747. In: Albert Henry Smyth (editor). ''The Writings of Benjamin Franklin''. Vol. 2, Item #60. The Macmillan Company, 1905. | [http://books.google.com/books?id=7-B2AAAAMAAJ&dq=the+writings+of+benjamin+franklin&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Book Full-Text].</ref> --> | <!-- <ref name=franklin1747>Franklin B. (1747) Letter: To Peter Collinson, Philadelphia, July 11, 1747. In: Albert Henry Smyth (editor). ''The Writings of Benjamin Franklin''. Vol. 2, Item #60. The Macmillan Company, 1905. | [http://books.google.com/books?id=7-B2AAAAMAAJ&dq=the+writings+of+benjamin+franklin&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Book Full-Text].</ref> --> | ||
<ref name=houston1905>Houston EJ. (1905) [http://books.google.com/ebooks?id=ZvBUAAAAMAAJ ''Electricity in every-day life'']. New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1905. | Google Book Full-Text Volume 1 of 3. | Compares rubbed amber with rubbed Aladdin's lamp.</ref> | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 12 June 2011
Introduction
| Once you have established those basic ideas about electricity, "like charges repel and unlike charges attract", then you have the foundation for electricity and can build from there. |
In reference to the physics and chemistry of electricity, charge, or more specifically, electric charge, is a fundamental property of matter that causes certain types of matter to generate and react to a force of attraction or repulsion to spatially separate matter that likewise manifests the property of electric charge.[1]
Whatever constitutes electric charge constitutes it in two separate varieties, or polarities, assigned the names 'positive' and 'negative', or 'plus' and 'minus'. The force of attraction between electrically charged items of matter arises between oppositely-charged items—positive-negative—whereas the force of repulsion arises between like-charged items—positive-positive, or negative-negative.
Familiar examples of positively charged matter are protons, constituents of the nuclei of atoms, and familiar examples of negatively charged matter are electrons, constituents of atoms that surround their nuclei.
Given that the terms 'positive' and 'negative' serve only as labels to distinguish the two polarities observed in the electric charge of matter, 'positivity' and 'negativity' do not themselves imply anything about the fundamental nature of electric charge. Other labels connoting di-polarity, such as yin/yang or bitter/sweet, could serve for labeling.
The atoms that comprise the chemical elements of the periodic table, while consisting in part of the electrically charged particles, protons and electrons, do not themselves manifest an electric charge, because protons in the nuclei and the surrounding electrons are equal in number and quantity of charge, that balance ensuring that the atoms as a whole manifest no net electric charge—a state referred to as electrical neutrality.
Discovery and naming of electric charge
The ancient Greeks as far back of Thales of Miletus had observed some of the simple phenomenology related to electric charge, speculating on mechanism, little coming of it, including terminology.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many
References
- ↑ Gibilisco S. (2005) Electricity Demystified. New York: McGraw-Hill. | Stan Gibilisco is an electronics engineer and mathematician, author of numerous technical books on electronics and mathematics.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "houston1905" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.