Obamacare: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Peter Schmitt
(some copyedits)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Obamacare''' is an broad term for the [[health care]] policies and practices of the [[Obama Administration]], based on the [[Affordable Health Care for America Act]] but including Presidential actions. Passage of the enabling legislation in the House and Senate was the prime legislative goal of the Administration.  Besides legislation, Executive Orders and other policies will affect its implentation.  While it was originated as a deprecatory term by Republicans, it is a common American journalistic shorthand for the Administration's initiative, simply because there is no short term that describes the multitude of legislative and executive initiatives under the program.
'''Obamacare''' is a broad term for the [[health care]] policies and practices of the [[Obama Administration]] that are based on the [[Affordable Health Care for America Act]] but include Presidential actions. Passage of the enabling legislation in the House and Senate was the prime legislative goal of the Administration.  Besides legislation, Executive Orders and other policies will affect its implentation.  While the term was originally coined by Republicans for deprecatory use, it now has become a common American journalistic shorthand for the Administration's initiative, simply because there is no short term that describes the multitude of legislative and executive initiatives under the program.


For example, the House bill included support for [[abortion]], but to get it through Congress, the President issued an [[Executive Order]] committing not to allocate Federal funds for abortion.
For example, the House bill included support for [[abortion]], but to get it through Congress, the President issued an [[Executive Order]] committing not to allocate Federal funds for abortion.


It is likely that aspects will need interpretation by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]]. The legislation requires Americans either to buy insurance or pay a penalty. Opponents claim this is a tax, and, for various reasons, is unconstitutional.
It is likely that several aspects will need interpretation by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]]. The legislation requires Americans either to buy insurance or to pay a penalty. Opponents claim that this is a tax, and, for various reasons, is unconstitutional.
 
==Politics==
==Politics==
Republicans, after the 2010 election, led by [[John Boehner]], strongly urge its appeal, but it is unlikely they have the votes for an outright reversal. They claim that a message from the 2010 election was that the American people do not want it, but polls reported by the ''New York Times'' say "only 18 percent said health care was the nation’s top issue. While 48 percent of voters said they wanted to repeal the health care law, 47 percent said they wanted to keep it the way it is or expand it."  A lesson to be learned by Democrats is that the American people are most concerned with jobs and the economy.<ref>{{citation
Republicans, after the 2010 election, led by [[John Boehner]], strongly urge its appeal, but it is unlikely they have the votes for an outright reversal. They claim that a message from the 2010 election was that the American people do not want it, but polls reported by the ''New York Times'' say "only 18 percent said health care was the nation’s top issue. While 48 percent of voters said they wanted to repeal the health care law, 47 percent said they wanted to keep it the way it is or expand it."  A lesson to be learned by Democrats is that the American people are most concerned with jobs and the economy.<ref>{{citation

Latest revision as of 03:54, 5 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Obamacare is a broad term for the health care policies and practices of the Obama Administration that are based on the Affordable Health Care for America Act but include Presidential actions. Passage of the enabling legislation in the House and Senate was the prime legislative goal of the Administration. Besides legislation, Executive Orders and other policies will affect its implentation. While the term was originally coined by Republicans for deprecatory use, it now has become a common American journalistic shorthand for the Administration's initiative, simply because there is no short term that describes the multitude of legislative and executive initiatives under the program.

For example, the House bill included support for abortion, but to get it through Congress, the President issued an Executive Order committing not to allocate Federal funds for abortion.

It is likely that several aspects will need interpretation by the Supreme Court. The legislation requires Americans either to buy insurance or to pay a penalty. Opponents claim that this is a tax, and, for various reasons, is unconstitutional.

Politics

Republicans, after the 2010 election, led by John Boehner, strongly urge its appeal, but it is unlikely they have the votes for an outright reversal. They claim that a message from the 2010 election was that the American people do not want it, but polls reported by the New York Times say "only 18 percent said health care was the nation’s top issue. While 48 percent of voters said they wanted to repeal the health care law, 47 percent said they wanted to keep it the way it is or expand it." A lesson to be learned by Democrats is that the American people are most concerned with jobs and the economy.[1]

Summary of the plan

References

  1. Editorial (3 November 2010), "Sorting Out the Election", New York Times