Talk:Yamato-class: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→hyphen not needed: please give me some examples) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:There's no standard. I see it with a hyphen more frequently than not, in naval literature. It's useful, I think, to help make it clear that one is talking about [[IJN Yamato]] versus [[Yamato-class]]. I really don't want to get into arguments about "all over the Internet". [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | :There's no standard. I see it with a hyphen more frequently than not, in naval literature. It's useful, I think, to help make it clear that one is talking about [[IJN Yamato]] versus [[Yamato-class]]. I really don't want to get into arguments about "all over the Internet". [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Please show me three examples of "naval literature" using it and I will say no more. Otherwise I will Move the article -- grammatically, it is not correct to have the hyphen. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 01:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:52, 15 July 2010
hyphen not needed
We have the "Iowa class battleships" all over the Internet without the hyphen, plus, as far as I can see, "Yamato class battleships" also all over the Internet with no hyphen. Just a slip of your computer finger? Hayford Peirce 22:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- There's no standard. I see it with a hyphen more frequently than not, in naval literature. It's useful, I think, to help make it clear that one is talking about IJN Yamato versus Yamato-class. I really don't want to get into arguments about "all over the Internet". Howard C. Berkowitz 01:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Please show me three examples of "naval literature" using it and I will say no more. Otherwise I will Move the article -- grammatically, it is not correct to have the hyphen. Hayford Peirce 01:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)