CZ Talk:Video Games Subgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jess Key
imported>Nick Bagnall
(added plan)
Line 8: Line 8:
* Each genre could then have a catalog like [[Massively multiplayer online role-playing game/Catalog/Games within the genre]].
* Each genre could then have a catalog like [[Massively multiplayer online role-playing game/Catalog/Games within the genre]].
--[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 12:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 12:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
==Plan to heavily rework the video game article==
You can see some of the work in my [[User:Nick_Bagnall/Sandbox|sandbox]]. Obviously it requires a lot of editing--I've left in some large block quotes (some of which have citations noted, some of which do not), there are occasional notes and reminders to myself, there are misplaced paragraphs, and so on. I need to reword a lot of sentences. Some sections need expansion; others require reduction. I know it's not at all complete.
But this is the result of months of (admittedly sporadic, but sometimes laborious) reading and work. The structure/subdivision alone took me quite a long time to finally settle on. I invite anyone to read and comment. Please tell me what you think! Do you think that my proposed changes, when refined, would be superior to the current video game article? (Per CZ policy, huge changes should be discussed beforehand.) [[User:Nick Bagnall|Nick Bagnall]] 12:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:58, 29 March 2010

Video Games banner.jpg
Main article Home Talk All articles (85) Citable (3) Members (4) Recent changes
Affiliation: Games (Recent changes)| Computers (Recent changes)| [ e ]


Video game/Catalogs/Games by genre

While I like the idea of cataloging games by genre, I don't agree with having one big list that would quickly become huge. Instead I would suggest:

--Chris Key 12:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Plan to heavily rework the video game article

You can see some of the work in my sandbox. Obviously it requires a lot of editing--I've left in some large block quotes (some of which have citations noted, some of which do not), there are occasional notes and reminders to myself, there are misplaced paragraphs, and so on. I need to reword a lot of sentences. Some sections need expansion; others require reduction. I know it's not at all complete.

But this is the result of months of (admittedly sporadic, but sometimes laborious) reading and work. The structure/subdivision alone took me quite a long time to finally settle on. I invite anyone to read and comment. Please tell me what you think! Do you think that my proposed changes, when refined, would be superior to the current video game article? (Per CZ policy, huge changes should be discussed beforehand.) Nick Bagnall 12:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)