CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0011: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk (→The resolution: adding changes suggested by Andrew Fleisher) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Whereas, CZ wishes to promote a professional image, which requires some consistency of style and format of articles; | Whereas, CZ wishes to promote a professional image, which requires some consistency of style and format of articles; | ||
Whereas, different disciplines | Whereas, different disciplines may require different approaches, thus ruling out a common standard for all articles, even within the same workgroup; | ||
Whereas, general guidance for authors remains limited, and is easier to develop within workgroups; | Whereas, general guidance for authors remains limited, and is easier to develop within workgroups; |
Revision as of 07:43, 10 June 2008
The resolution
Whereas, CZ wishes to promote a professional image, which requires some consistency of style and format of articles;
Whereas, different disciplines may require different approaches, thus ruling out a common standard for all articles, even within the same workgroup;
Whereas, general guidance for authors remains limited, and is easier to develop within workgroups;
Resolved, That Citizendium will develop a range of workgroup stylesheets for the guidance of authors and editors
Method of execution
The Council will call for a lead editor in each workgroup, to oversee and develop the stylesheet or stylesheets for that workgroup
Amendments
Vote
Current status
- Initial (private) comments
Discussion
- Proposal outline: CZ:Proposals/Create_workgroup_style_guides
Sponsors
- Sponsor: David E. Volk
- Co-sponsors: Martin Baldwin-Edwards, John Moffett
Before it is added to the Agenda, these sponsors, but only these sponsors, may edit the text of the resolution. After it is added to the Agenda, it cannot be edited by anyone except via the amendment process.
Resolution history
- Proposed: 09 June, 2008
- Entered queue: (bypassed queue)
- Entered initial discussion: 10 June, 2008 for 6 days
- Entered public discussion:
- Entered discussion of Amendment 1:
- Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1:
- Entered voting on motion to amend
- Close of voting motion to amend
- Entered voting on resolution:
- Close of voting on resolution:
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List Archives • Resolutions • Log • Essential Policy •