Archive:Workgroup Weeks/We can do this: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
First, I organized Nupedia and then Wikipedia by doing the sort of recruitment I am inviting you all to do. In fact, I've done this sort of thing many times. I ''know'' it works. If we follow this plan, we ''will'' get massive numbers of excellent new participants. It's not a question of whether the plan is sound, it's a question of whether we have the will to do [[CZ:Workgroup Weeks/Preparation|the hard work]] to make it happen! If we do it, they will come, and in droves. | First, I organized Nupedia and then Wikipedia by doing the sort of recruitment I am inviting you all to do. In fact, I've done this sort of thing many times. I ''know'' it works. If we follow this plan, we ''will'' get massive numbers of excellent new participants. It's not a question of whether the plan is sound, it's a question of whether we have the will to do [[CZ:Workgroup Weeks/Preparation|the hard work]] to make it happen! If we do it, they will come, and in droves. | ||
Second, this initiative is modelled partly on our successful and ongoing [[CZ:Monthly Write-a-Thon|Monthly Write-a-Thon]]s. It is worth examining [http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/08/09/why-the-write-a-thon-worked/ why this works.] We announce that on the first Wednesday of each month, there will be an "event." Because people (justifiably) think the wiki will be active, more people than usual show up. There is a ''shared understanding'' that allows people to ''coordinate their activity'' and reap the rewards of their coordination. | |||
Well, there are many, many experts out there who would ''like'' to work on something like Wikipedia, but they don't really like Wikipedia itself, and they don't know how to start something better--basically, they don't know how to get coordinated. That's where CZ steps in. We circulate a message far and wide around the Internet: | |||
:''We'' are the opportunity you've been waiting for. On ''this specific week,'' we invite all X-ologists to converge on the ''Citizendium'' to give it a serious try. It's worked very well so far, as you can see, so now it's just a matter of building up both content and community. So, if you show up on that week, we'll bootstrap CZ's X-ology Workgroup into a more robust existence. Shall we give it a try? | |||
The answer, I am very confident, will be a resounding "Yes!" But, again, in order to make this happen, we need to coordinate ourselves in advance, in order to get the word out and make the event a reality. | |||
Practically since the beginning of our existence we have been wondering how to build up our workgroups so that they have a more robust existence, so that we can get a core group in each discipline who can "goad" each other into action and attract new people. Workgroup Weeks is specifically designed to solve that problem. It is the single best idea on offer to "kick-start" our workgroups. | |||
(4) There's no need to get this approved. | (4) There's no need to get this approved. | ||
(5) You're needed. You don't have to do it all yourself, but if we come together, we'll accomplish huge things. | (5) You're needed. You don't have to do it all yourself, but if we come together, we'll accomplish huge things. |
Revision as of 13:45, 8 May 2008
Dear Citizens,
I am officially announcing the Workgroup Weeks (http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Workgroup_Weeks) initiative. Workgroup Weeks will promote a workgroup for a week: each week, we will be promoting and highlighting a different Citizendium workgroup. For example, we'll have "Biology Week," "History Week," and "Music Week." There will be a major headline on the front page, and other internal and external publicity for the event. Leading up to each week, we'll be doing significant recruitment. This is similar in concept to the Write-a-Thons, but extends across the entire presence of a single discipline on the Internet.
Workgroup Weeks is the biggest initiative we have planned so far, in terms both of the amount of labor needed and of the potential positive impact. It has the potential not just to raise our participation rates by double or triple, but by orders of magnitude. We have never done a massive, concerted, ongoing recruitment effort. I know from experience that when we do this, we'll reap enormous dividends.
Now, if we were to leave this hard work to one person--me, say--I estimate it would take that person about a year of full-time work to get it done. We can't afford to pay anyone to do that, and I personally don't have the time to do it, with everything else I must do for the project. But if we all get together, and spread the work out over many weeks, we'll require relatively little work from each person, while the concerted, collective impact of that work will be tremendous.
But, to have that impact, we must get organized. To get organized, you have to get motivated--and so I need to persuade you that this will work and will be worth the effort.
First, I organized Nupedia and then Wikipedia by doing the sort of recruitment I am inviting you all to do. In fact, I've done this sort of thing many times. I know it works. If we follow this plan, we will get massive numbers of excellent new participants. It's not a question of whether the plan is sound, it's a question of whether we have the will to do the hard work to make it happen! If we do it, they will come, and in droves.
Second, this initiative is modelled partly on our successful and ongoing Monthly Write-a-Thons. It is worth examining why this works. We announce that on the first Wednesday of each month, there will be an "event." Because people (justifiably) think the wiki will be active, more people than usual show up. There is a shared understanding that allows people to coordinate their activity and reap the rewards of their coordination.
Well, there are many, many experts out there who would like to work on something like Wikipedia, but they don't really like Wikipedia itself, and they don't know how to start something better--basically, they don't know how to get coordinated. That's where CZ steps in. We circulate a message far and wide around the Internet:
- We are the opportunity you've been waiting for. On this specific week, we invite all X-ologists to converge on the Citizendium to give it a serious try. It's worked very well so far, as you can see, so now it's just a matter of building up both content and community. So, if you show up on that week, we'll bootstrap CZ's X-ology Workgroup into a more robust existence. Shall we give it a try?
The answer, I am very confident, will be a resounding "Yes!" But, again, in order to make this happen, we need to coordinate ourselves in advance, in order to get the word out and make the event a reality.
Practically since the beginning of our existence we have been wondering how to build up our workgroups so that they have a more robust existence, so that we can get a core group in each discipline who can "goad" each other into action and attract new people. Workgroup Weeks is specifically designed to solve that problem. It is the single best idea on offer to "kick-start" our workgroups.
(4) There's no need to get this approved.
(5) You're needed. You don't have to do it all yourself, but if we come together, we'll accomplish huge things.