Talk:Chili-mac (vegetarian): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Todd Coles (→More than a recipe: new section) |
imported>Todd Coles (→More than a recipe: deletion) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think we need to make it a practice that we do not write recipes as stand alone articles. There needs to be information about what the food is, where it's from, it's history, etc, etc. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:40, 25 April 2008 (CDT) | I think we need to make it a practice that we do not write recipes as stand alone articles. There needs to be information about what the food is, where it's from, it's history, etc, etc. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:40, 25 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
: Just stumbled across this again, so I'm just re-posting this message to see if it gets any attention. Nothing wrong with the recipe per se, but it would probably fit better as a recipe under an article about chili, for example. I'm not sure vegetarian chili mac demands it's own article, and certainly not if it is not going to be developed beyond a basic recipe. I'll be nominating this for deletion in a few days if there are no comments. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 03:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:28, 5 February 2009
|
Metadata here |
More than a recipe
I think we need to make it a practice that we do not write recipes as stand alone articles. There needs to be information about what the food is, where it's from, it's history, etc, etc. --Todd Coles 15:40, 25 April 2008 (CDT)
- Just stumbled across this again, so I'm just re-posting this message to see if it gets any attention. Nothing wrong with the recipe per se, but it would probably fit better as a recipe under an article about chili, for example. I'm not sure vegetarian chili mac demands it's own article, and certainly not if it is not going to be developed beyond a basic recipe. I'll be nominating this for deletion in a few days if there are no comments. --Todd Coles 03:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)