Talk:Libertarianism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>T. J. Frazier (→Common good: new section) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I suggest that many libertarians would object to the phrase "bringing about the common good" to define their intentions. It might be gracefully reworded as "benefiting all individuals", which I propose to do. Both phrases somewhat reflect a point of view; a statement of libertarian intentions should probably use their point of view. --[[User:T. J. Frazier|T. J. Frazier]] 14:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | I suggest that many libertarians would object to the phrase "bringing about the common good" to define their intentions. It might be gracefully reworded as "benefiting all individuals", which I propose to do. Both phrases somewhat reflect a point of view; a statement of libertarian intentions should probably use their point of view. --[[User:T. J. Frazier|T. J. Frazier]] 14:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:How do you feel about enlightened self-interest? Is that too specifically Randian? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:41, 27 August 2010
|
Metadata here |
Common good
I suggest that many libertarians would object to the phrase "bringing about the common good" to define their intentions. It might be gracefully reworded as "benefiting all individuals", which I propose to do. Both phrases somewhat reflect a point of view; a statement of libertarian intentions should probably use their point of view. --T. J. Frazier 14:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- How do you feel about enlightened self-interest? Is that too specifically Randian? Howard C. Berkowitz 16:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)